These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
170 related items for PubMed ID: 28494595
1. Clinical performance of a glass ionomer sealant protected with two different resin-based agents over a 2-year follow-up period. Ulusoy AT, Tunc ES, Bayrak Ş. Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2017 Mar; 18(1):10-14. PubMed ID: 28494595 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Twenty-four month clinical evaluation of fissure sealants on partially erupted permanent first molars: glass ionomer versus resin-based sealant. Antonson SA, Antonson DE, Brener S, Crutchfield J, Larumbe J, Michaud C, Yazici AR, Hardigan PC, Alempour S, Evans D, Ocanto R. J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Feb; 143(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 22298552 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Retention of a resin-based sealant and a glass ionomer used as a fissure sealant: a comparative clinical study. Subramaniam P, Konde S, Mandanna DK. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2008 Sep; 26(3):114-20. PubMed ID: 18923223 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Caries prevention effectiveness of aresin based sealant and a glass ionomer sealants: a report of 5-year-follow-up]. Liu YJ, Chang Q, Rong WS, Zhao XL. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jul 09; 53(7):437-442. PubMed ID: 29996359 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The success rates of a glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant placed by fifth-year undergraduate dental students. Ulusu T, Odabaş ME, Tüzüner T, Baygin O, Sillelioğlu H, Deveci C, Gökdoğan FG, Altuntaş A. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2012 Apr 09; 13(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 22449810 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Survival Analysis of Glass Ionomer Cement and Resin-Based Sealant Retention: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study. Petrauskienė S, Saldūnaitė-Mikučionienė K, Narbutaitė J. Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 May 01; 60(5):. PubMed ID: 38792939 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Caries-Preventive Effect and Retention of Glass-Ionomer and Resin-Based Sealants: A Randomized Clinical Comparative Evaluation. Uzel I, Gurlek C, Kuter B, Ertugrul F, Eden E. Biomed Res Int; 2022 May 01; 2022():7205692. PubMed ID: 35769675 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical and antibacterial effectiveness of three different sealant materials. Amin HE. J Dent Hyg; 2008 May 01; 82(5):45. PubMed ID: 19055885 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Caries-preventive effect of a one-time application of composite resin and glass ionomer sealants after 5 years. Beiruti N, Frencken JE, van't Hof MA, Taifour D, van Palenstein Helderman WH. Caries Res; 2006 May 01; 40(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 16352882 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Microcavitated (ICDAS 3) carious lesion arrest with resin or glass ionomer sealants in first permanent molars: A randomized controlled trial. Muñoz-Sandoval C, Gambetta-Tessini K, Giacaman RA. J Dent; 2019 Sep 01; 88():103163. PubMed ID: 31276747 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Retention and remineralization effect of moisture tolerant resin-based sealant and glass ionomer sealant on non-cavitated pit and fissure caries: Randomized controlled clinical trial. Alsabek L, Al-Nerabieah Z, Bshara N, Comisi JC. J Dent; 2019 Jul 01; 86():69-74. PubMed ID: 31136817 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical comparison of Fuji VII and a resin sealant in children at high and low risk of caries. Chen Xx, Liu Xg. Dent Mater J; 2013 Jul 01; 32(3):512-8. PubMed ID: 23719016 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Caries-Preventive Effect of High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer and Resin-Based Fissure Sealants on Permanent Teeth: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials. Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V. PLoS One; 2016 Jul 01; 11(1):e0146512. PubMed ID: 26799812 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of glass-ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants: a 2-year clinical trial. Forss H, Saarni UM, Seppä L. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1994 Feb 01; 22(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 8143437 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Retention rates and caries-preventive effects of two different sealant materials: a randomised clinical trial. Cabral RN, Faber J, Otero SAM, Hilgert LA, Leal SC. Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Dec 01; 22(9):3171-3177. PubMed ID: 29524027 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A 5-year evaluation of two glass-ionomer cements used as fissure sealants. Pardi V, Pereira AC, Mialhe FL, Meneghim Mde C, Ambrosano GM. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2003 Oct 01; 31(5):386-91. PubMed ID: 14667010 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Caries-preventive effect of sealants produced with altered glass-ionomer materials, after 2 years. Chen X, Du MQ, Fan MW, Mulder J, Huysmans MC, Frencken JE. Dent Mater; 2012 May 01; 28(5):554-60. PubMed ID: 22300651 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Retention Ability of a Glass Carbomer Pit and Fissure Sealant. Beresescu L, Kovacs M, Vlasa A, Stoica AM, Benedek C, Pop M, Bungardean D, Eșian D. Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Feb 10; 19(4):. PubMed ID: 35206153 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing the caries-preventive effect of two fissure sealing modalities in public health care: a single application of glass ionomer and a routine resin-based sealant programme. A randomized split-mouth clinical trial. Kervanto-Seppälä S, Lavonius E, Pietilä I, Pitkäniemi J, Meurman JH, Kerosuo E. Int J Paediatr Dent; 2008 Jan 10; 18(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 18086027 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Caries-preventive efficacy and retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant: a 3-year split-mouth randomised clinical trial. Baseggio W, Naufel FS, Davidoff DC, Nahsan FP, Flury S, Rodrigues JA. Oral Health Prev Dent; 2010 Jan 10; 8(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 20848004 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]