These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


677 related items for PubMed ID: 28508549

  • 1. Prenatal prediction of postnatal large-for-dates neonates using a simplified MRI method: comparison with conventional 2D ultrasound estimates.
    Kadji C, Cannie MM, De Angelis R, Camus M, Klass M, Fellas S, Cecotti V, Dütemeyer V, Jani JC.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 52(2):250-257. PubMed ID: 28508549
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Prenatal prediction of small-for-gestational age neonates using MR imaging: comparison with conventional 2D ultrasound.
    Carlin A, Kadji C, De Angelis R, Cannie MM, Jani JC.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 May; 32(10):1673-1681. PubMed ID: 29212395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Prediction of large-for-gestational-age neonate by routine third-trimester ultrasound.
    Khan N, Ciobanu A, Karampitsakos T, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 54(3):326-333. PubMed ID: 31236963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks' gestation: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates.
    Ciobanu A, Khan N, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 53(6):761-768. PubMed ID: 30883981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Prediction of fetal macrosomia using two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound.
    Mazzone E, Dall'Asta A, Kiener AJO, Carpano MG, Suprani A, Ghi T, Frusca T.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Dec; 243():26-31. PubMed ID: 31670065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate by third-trimester fetal biometry and impact of ultrasound-delivery interval.
    Reboul Q, Delabaere A, Luo ZC, Nuyt AM, Wu Y, Chauleur C, Fraser W, Audibert F.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):372-378. PubMed ID: 27153518
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Prediction of large-for-gestational age at 36 weeks' gestation: two-dimensional ultrasound vs three-dimensional ultrasound vs magnetic resonance imaging.
    Mazzone E, Kadji C, Cannie MM, Badr DA, Jani JC.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Apr; 63(4):489-496. PubMed ID: 37725758
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging at 36 weeks predicts neonatal macrosomia: the PREMACRO study.
    Kadji C, Cannie MM, Kang X, Carlin A, Benjou Etchoua S, Resta S, Dütemeyer V, Abi-Khalil F, Mazzone E, Bevilacqua E, Jani JC.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Feb; 226(2):238.e1-238.e12. PubMed ID: 34358479
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by cerebroplacental ratio adjusted for estimated fetal weight.
    Sirico A, Diemert A, Glosemeyer P, Hecher K.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Mar; 51(3):381-386. PubMed ID: 28294442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Fetal Medicine Foundation fetal and neonatal population weight charts.
    Nicolaides KH, Wright D, Syngelaki A, Wright A, Akolekar R.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 29696704
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. First-trimester and combined first- and second-trimester prediction of small-for-gestational age and late fetal growth restriction.
    Sotiriadis A, Figueras F, Eleftheriades M, Papaioannou GK, Chorozoglou G, Dinas K, Papantoniou N.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 53(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 29573501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of conventional 2D ultrasound to magnetic resonance imaging for prenatal estimation of birthweight in twin pregnancy.
    Kadji C, Bevilacqua E, Hurtado I, Carlin A, Cannie MM, Jani JC.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 218(1):128.e1-128.e11. PubMed ID: 29045850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Repeatability of estimated fetal weight: Comparison between MR imaging versus 2D ultrasound in at- and near-term patients.
    Kadji C, Camus MF, Bevilacqua E, Cannie MM, Sanchez TC, Jani JC.
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Jun; 91():35-40. PubMed ID: 28629568
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Antenatal magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasound for predicting neonatal macrosomia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Malin GL, Bugg GJ, Takwoingi Y, Thornton JG, Jones NW.
    BJOG; 2016 Jan; 123(1):77-88. PubMed ID: 26224221
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Protocol for the prospective observational clinical study: estimation of fetal weight by MRI to PREdict neonatal MACROsomia (PREMACRO study) and small-for-gestational age neonates.
    Kadji C, Cannie MM, Carlin A, Jani JC.
    BMJ Open; 2019 Mar 27; 9(3):e027160. PubMed ID: 30918039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Diagnostic accuracy of individual antenatal tools for prediction of small-for-gestational age at birth.
    Poljak B, Agarwal U, Jackson R, Alfirevic Z, Sharp A.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr 27; 49(4):493-499. PubMed ID: 27486031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 34.