These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

391 related items for PubMed ID: 28528786

  • 1. Acoustic Perturbation Measures Improve with Increasing Vocal Intensity in Individuals With and Without Voice Disorders.
    Brockmann-Bauser M, Bohlender JE, Mehta DD.
    J Voice; 2018 Mar; 32(2):162-168. PubMed ID: 28528786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effects of Speech Characteristics on Electroglottographic and Instrumental Acoustic Voice Analysis Metrics in Women With Structural Dysphonia Before and After Treatment.
    Iob NA, He L, Ternström S, Cai H, Brockmann-Bauser M.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Jun 06; 67(6):1660-1681. PubMed ID: 38758676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effects of Vocal Intensity and Fundamental Frequency on Cepstral Peak Prominence in Patients with Voice Disorders and Vocally Healthy Controls.
    Brockmann-Bauser M, Van Stan JH, Carvalho Sampaio M, Bohlender JE, Hillman RE, Mehta DD.
    J Voice; 2021 May 06; 35(3):411-417. PubMed ID: 31859213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Clinical relevance of speaking voice intensity effects on acoustic jitter and shimmer in children between 5;0 and 9;11 years.
    Brockmann-Bauser M, Beyer D, Bohlender JE.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Dec 06; 78(12):2121-6. PubMed ID: 25441603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Correlation of VHI-30 to Acoustic Measurements Across Three Common Voice Disorders.
    Dehqan A, Yadegari F, Scherer RC, Dabirmoghadam P.
    J Voice; 2017 Jan 06; 31(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 27085912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Differences and Reliability of Linear and Nonlinear Acoustic Measures as a Function of Vocal Intensity in Individuals With Voice Disorders.
    de Oliveira Florencio V, Almeida AA, Balata P, Nascimento S, Brockmann-Bauser M, Lopes LW.
    J Voice; 2023 Sep 06; 37(5):663-681. PubMed ID: 34116889
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A Comparison of Healthy and Disordered Voices Using Multi-Dimensional Voice Program, Praat, and TF32.
    Keung LC, Richardson K, Sharp Matheron D, Martel-Sauvageau V.
    J Voice; 2024 Jul 06; 38(4):963.e23-963.e38. PubMed ID: 35246346
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Reliable jitter and shimmer measurements in voice clinics: the relevance of vowel, gender, vocal intensity, and fundamental frequency effects in a typical clinical task.
    Brockmann M, Drinnan MJ, Storck C, Carding PN.
    J Voice; 2011 Jan 06; 25(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 20381308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Acoustic analyses of thyroidectomy-related changes in vowel phonation.
    Solomon NP, Awan SN, Helou LB, Stojadinovic A.
    J Voice; 2012 Nov 06; 26(6):711-20. PubMed ID: 23177742
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Survey of Voice Acoustic Parameters in Iranian Female Teachers.
    Mohseni R, Sandoughdar N.
    J Voice; 2016 Jul 06; 30(4):507.e1-5. PubMed ID: 26275636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Reliable acoustic measurements in children between 5;0 and 9;11 years: Gender, age, height and weight effects on fundamental frequency, jitter and shimmer in phonations without and with controlled voice SPL.
    Brockmann-Bauser M, Beyer D, Bohlender JE.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Dec 06; 79(12):2035-42. PubMed ID: 26412461
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Acoustic Voice Analysis and Maximum Phonation Time in Relation to Voice Handicap Index Score and Larynx Disease.
    Karlsen T, Sandvik L, Heimdal JH, Aarstad HJ.
    J Voice; 2020 Jan 06; 34(1):161.e27-161.e35. PubMed ID: 30093166
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Objective Evaluation of Presbyphonia: Spectroacoustic Study on 142 Patients with Praat.
    Mezzedimi C, Di Francesco M, Livi W, Spinosi MC, De Felice C.
    J Voice; 2017 Mar 06; 31(2):257.e25-257.e32. PubMed ID: 27427181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Vocal Performance of Group Fitness Instructors Before and After Instruction: Changes in Acoustic Measures and Self-Ratings.
    Dallaston K, Rumbach AF.
    J Voice; 2016 Jan 06; 30(1):127.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25795364
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Voice Acoustic Analysis of Pediatric Vocal Nodule Patients Using Ratios Calculated With Biomedical Image Segmentation.
    Bilal N, Selcuk T, Sarica S, Alkan A, Orhan İ, Doganer A, Sagiroglu S, Kılıc MA.
    J Voice; 2019 Mar 06; 33(2):195-203. PubMed ID: 29273231
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Correlation of the Iranian Voice Quality of Life Profile (IVQLP) with Acoustic Measurements across Three Common Voice Disorders.
    Dehqan A, Scherer RC, Yadegari F, Dashti G.
    J Voice; 2018 Jul 06; 32(4):514.e7-514.e11. PubMed ID: 28965662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Acoustic voice analysis in the COVID-19 era.
    Cavallaro G, Di Nicola V, Quaranta N, Fiorella ML.
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2021 Feb 06; 41(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 33231205
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effects of Fundamental Frequency, Vocal Intensity, Sample Duration, and Vowel Context in Cepstral and Spectral Measures of Dysphonic Voices.
    Sampaio M, Vaz Masson ML, de Paula Soares MF, Bohlender JE, Brockmann-Bauser M.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 May 22; 63(5):1326-1339. PubMed ID: 32348195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evaluation of Electrostimulation Effect in Women With Vocal Nodules.
    Santos JK, Silvério KC, Diniz Oliveira NF, Gama AC.
    J Voice; 2016 Nov 22; 30(6):769.e1-769.e7. PubMed ID: 26822388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.