These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

361 related items for PubMed ID: 28534068

  • 1. Trust in haptic assistance: weighting visual and haptic cues based on error history.
    Gibo TL, Mugge W, Abbink DA.
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Aug; 235(8):2533-2546. PubMed ID: 28534068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Texture and haptic cues in slant discrimination: reliability-based cue weighting without statistically optimal cue combination.
    Rosas P, Wagemans J, Ernst MO, Wichmann FA.
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2005 May; 22(5):801-9. PubMed ID: 15898539
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Optimal visual-haptic integration with articulated tools.
    Takahashi C, Watt SJ.
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 May; 235(5):1361-1373. PubMed ID: 28214998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Reliance on Haptic Assistance Reflected in Haptic Cue Weighting.
    Gibo TL, Plaisier MA, Mugge W, Abbink DA.
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2019 May; 12(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 30106693
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Visual-haptic adaptation is determined by relative reliability.
    Burge J, Girshick AR, Banks MS.
    J Neurosci; 2010 Jun 02; 30(22):7714-21. PubMed ID: 20519546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Visual cuing effect for haptic angle judgment].
    Era A, Yokosawa K.
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2009 Aug 02; 80(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 19803386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Reweighting visual cues by touch.
    van Beers RJ, van Mierlo CM, Smeets JB, Brenner E.
    J Vis; 2011 Sep 27; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 21954298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Experience-dependent visual cue recalibration based on discrepancies between visual and haptic percepts.
    Atkins JE, Jacobs RA, Knill DC.
    Vision Res; 2003 Nov 27; 43(25):2603-13. PubMed ID: 14552802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Visual-haptic cue weighting is independent of modality-specific attention.
    Helbig HB, Ernst MO.
    J Vis; 2008 Jan 31; 8(1):21.1-16. PubMed ID: 18318624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Integration of force and position cues for shape perception through active touch.
    Drewing K, Ernst MO.
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar 17; 1078(1):92-100. PubMed ID: 16494854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The Effect of Ageing on Optimal Integration of Conflicting and Non-Conflicting Visual-Haptic Stimuli.
    Couth S, Poole D, Gowen E, Champion RA, Warren PA, Poliakoff E.
    Multisens Res; 2019 Dec 11; 32(8):771-796. PubMed ID: 31291612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Experience-dependent visual cue integration based on consistencies between visual and haptic percepts.
    Atkins JE, Fiser J, Jacobs RA.
    Vision Res; 2001 Feb 11; 41(4):449-61. PubMed ID: 11166048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Persistent grasping errors produce depth cue reweighting in perception.
    Cesanek E, Taylor JA, Domini F.
    Vision Res; 2021 Jan 11; 178():1-11. PubMed ID: 33070029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Grasping a 2D object: terminal haptic feedback supports an absolute visuo-haptic calibration.
    Hosang S, Chan J, Davarpanah Jazi S, Heath M.
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Apr 11; 234(4):945-54. PubMed ID: 26680769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Pantomime-grasping: the 'return' of haptic feedback supports the absolute specification of object size.
    Davarpanah Jazi S, Yau M, Westwood DA, Heath M.
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jul 11; 233(7):2029-40. PubMed ID: 25869741
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Cue reliability and a landmark stability heuristic determine relative weighting between egocentric and allocentric visual information in memory-guided reach.
    Byrne PA, Crawford JD.
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Jun 11; 103(6):3054-69. PubMed ID: 20457858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.