These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

422 related items for PubMed ID: 28537138

  • 1. Development and evaluation of the British English coordinate response measure speech-in-noise test as an occupational hearing assessment tool.
    Semeraro HD, Rowan D, van Besouw RM, Allsopp AA.
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 56(10):749-758. PubMed ID: 28537138
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Internationally comparable screening tests for listening in noise in several European languages: the German digit triplet test as an optimization prototype.
    Zokoll MA, Wagener KC, Brand T, Buschermöhle M, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):697-707. PubMed ID: 22762202
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Laboratory evaluation of an optimised internet-based speech-in-noise test for occupational high-frequency hearing loss screening: Occupational Earcheck.
    Sheikh Rashid M, Leensen MCJ, de Laat JAPM, Dreschler WA.
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):844-853. PubMed ID: 28587489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Development and validation of a smartphone-based digits-in-noise hearing test in South African English.
    Potgieter JM, Swanepoel de W, Myburgh HC, Hopper TC, Smits C.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 55(7):405-11. PubMed ID: 27121117
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 1: test evaluation for noise-induced hearing loss identification.
    Leensen MC, de Laat JA, Dreschler WA.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):823-34. PubMed ID: 21988504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Development and validation of the Speech Reception in Noise (SPRINT) Test.
    Brungart DS, Walden B, Cord M, Phatak S, Theodoroff SM, Griest S, Grant KW.
    Hear Res; 2017 Jun; 349():90-97. PubMed ID: 28111321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A Danish open-set speech corpus for competing-speech studies.
    Nielsen JB, Dau T, Neher T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):407-20. PubMed ID: 24437781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The Danish hearing in noise test.
    Nielsen JB, Dau T.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 21319937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 2: improving test sensitivity for noise-induced hearing loss.
    Leensen MC, de Laat JA, Snik AF, Dreschler WA.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):835-48. PubMed ID: 21970351
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
    Wardenga N, Batsoulis C, Wagener KC, Brand T, Lenarz T, Maier H.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Nov; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. An algorithm that administers adaptive speech-in-noise testing to a specified reliability at selectable points on the psychometric function.
    Keidser G, Dillon H, Mejia J, Nguyen CV.
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Nov; 52(11):795-800. PubMed ID: 23957444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Development and validation of the Leuven intelligibility sentence test with male speaker (LIST-m).
    Jansen S, Koning R, Wouters J, van Wieringen A.
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 24152309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The effect of sensorineural hearing loss and tinnitus on speech recognition over air and bone conduction military communications headsets.
    Manning C, Mermagen T, Scharine A.
    Hear Res; 2017 Jun; 349():67-75. PubMed ID: 27989949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Acceptable noise level (ANL) with Danish and non-semantic speech materials in adult hearing-aid users.
    Olsen SØ, Lantz J, Nielsen LH, Brännström KJ.
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):678-88. PubMed ID: 22731922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Masked speech perception across the adult lifespan: Impact of age and hearing impairment.
    Goossens T, Vercammen C, Wouters J, van Wieringen A.
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():109-124. PubMed ID: 27845259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests.
    Hochmuth S, Kollmeier B, Brand T, Jürgens T.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Feb; 54 Suppl 2():62-70. PubMed ID: 26097982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Development of an Arabic "Command in Noise" Hearing Test to Assess Fitness for Duty.
    Rawas I, Rowan D, Semeraro H, Bleeck S, Bamanie A.
    Noise Health; 2023 Feb; 25(117):104-112. PubMed ID: 37203127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. An Italian matrix sentence test for the evaluation of speech intelligibility in noise.
    Puglisi GE, Warzybok A, Hochmuth S, Visentin C, Astolfi A, Prodi N, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Feb; 54 Suppl 2():44-50. PubMed ID: 26371592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing.
    Zamaninezhad L, Hohmann V, Büchner A, Schädler MR, Jürgens T.
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S, Dau T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.