These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

259 related items for PubMed ID: 28539028

  • 1. [Speech intelligibility in elderly hearing impaired people].
    Boboshko MY, Golovanova LE, Zhilinskaia EV, Ogorodnikova EA.
    Adv Gerontol; 2016; 29(4):663-669. PubMed ID: 28539028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D, Ahlstrom JB, Bologna WJ, Dubno JR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL, Pichora-Fuller MK, Wilson RH, Macdonald EN.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Jun; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Festen JM.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Jun; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Audiovisual asynchrony detection and speech intelligibility in noise with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing impairment.
    Başkent D, Bazo D.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Jun; 32(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 21389856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effects of different noises on speech discrimination by the elderly.
    Prosser S, Turrini M, Arslan E.
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990 Jun; 476():136-42. PubMed ID: 2087954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effects of age and hearing loss on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.
    Shafiro V, Sheft S, Risley R, Gygi B.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):745-56. PubMed ID: 25698009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Measuring the effects of reverberation and noise on sentence intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners.
    George EL, Goverts ST, Festen JM, Houtgast T.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 53(6):1429-39. PubMed ID: 20689027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [The influence of central auditory processing on the intelligibility of the speech in the patients presenting with hearing impairment].
    Boboshko MY, Berdnikova IP, Garbaruk ES, Salakhbekov MA, Mal'tseva NV.
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2018 Dec; 83(2):4-8. PubMed ID: 29697645
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Relations Between the Intelligibility of Speech in Noise and Psychophysical Measures of Hearing Measured in Four Languages Using the Auditory Profile Test Battery.
    Van Esch TE, Dreschler WA.
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec 08; 19():. PubMed ID: 26647417
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Auditory detection, discrimination and speech processing in ageing, noise-sensitive and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Abel SM, Krever EM, Alberti PW.
    Scand Audiol; 1990 Dec 08; 19(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 2336540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Modeling speech intelligibility in quiet and noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Rhebergen KS, Lyzenga J, Dreschler WA, Festen JM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar 08; 127(3):1570-83. PubMed ID: 20329857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Völker C, Warzybok A, Ernst SM.
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec 30; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Relations between intelligibility of narrow-band speech and auditory functions, both in the 1-kHz frequency region.
    Noordhoek IM, Houtgast T, Festen JM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Mar 30; 109(3):1197-212. PubMed ID: 11303933
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Central presbycusis.
    Welsh LW, Welsh JJ, Healy MP.
    Laryngoscope; 1985 Feb 30; 95(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 3968946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Presbycusis and phonemic regression.
    Tyberghein J.
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1996 Feb 30; 50(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 8767250
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Relative contributions of auditory and cognitive functions on speech recognition in quiet and in noise among older adults.
    Mukari SZMS, Yusof Y, Ishak WS, Maamor N, Chellapan K, Dzulkifli MA.
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Feb 30; 86(2):149-156. PubMed ID: 30558985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Speech intelligibility in adults after the new coronavirus infection (COVID-19)].
    Boboshko MY, Garbaruk ES, Vikhnina SM, Golovanova LE, Ogorodnikova EA.
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2023 Feb 30; 88(6):15-21. PubMed ID: 38153888
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Recognition of digits in different types of noise by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Smits C, Houtgast T.
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Mar 30; 46(3):134-44. PubMed ID: 17365067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparing auditory filter bandwidths, spectral ripple modulation detection, spectral ripple discrimination, and speech recognition: Normal and impaired hearing.
    Davies-Venn E, Nelson P, Souza P.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul 30; 138(1):492-503. PubMed ID: 26233047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.