These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

696 related items for PubMed ID: 28542096

  • 1. Modified Dual-Energy Algorithm for Calcified Plaque Removal: Evaluation in Carotid Computed Tomography Angiography and Comparison With Digital Subtraction Angiography.
    Mannil M, Ramachandran J, Vittoria de Martini I, Wegener S, Schmidt B, Flohr T, Krauss B, Valavanis A, Alkadhi H, Winklhofer S.
    Invest Radiol; 2017 Nov; 52(11):680-685. PubMed ID: 28542096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Dual Energy Computed Tomography of Internal Carotid Artery: A Modified Dual-Energy Algorithm for Calcified Plaque Removal, Compared With Digital Subtraction Angiography.
    Qu H, Gao Y, Li M, Zhai S, Zhang M, Lu J.
    Front Neurol; 2020 Nov; 11():621202. PubMed ID: 33633659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of Modified Calcium Removal Algorithm in dual energy CT of Internal Carotid Artery.
    Chen J, Niu Z, Zhan K, Tao X, Tian F, Ding J, Jin Z, Hu X.
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Dec; 145():109927. PubMed ID: 34773829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Angiography of the Head and Neck With Single-Source Computed Tomography: A New Technical (Split Filter) Approach for Bone Removal.
    Kaemmerer N, Brand M, Hammon M, May M, Wuest W, Krauss B, Uder M, Lell MM.
    Invest Radiol; 2016 Oct; 51(10):618-23. PubMed ID: 27187046
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Modified calcium subtraction in dual-energy CT angiography of the lower extremity runoff: impact on diagnostic accuracy for stenosis detection.
    De Santis D, De Cecco CN, Schoepf UJ, Nance JW, Yamada RT, Thomas BA, Otani K, Jacobs BE, Turner DA, Wichmann JL, Eid M, Varga-Szemes A, Caruso D, Grant KL, Schmidt B, Vogl TJ, Laghi A, Albrecht MH.
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4783-4793. PubMed ID: 30805703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Dual-Energy CTA in Patients with Symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease: Study of Diagnostic Accuracy and Impeding Factors.
    Klink T, Wilhelm T, Roth C, Heverhagen JT.
    Rofo; 2017 May; 189(5):441-452. PubMed ID: 28249314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Dual-energy CT head bone and hard plaque removal for quantification of calcified carotid stenosis: utility and comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
    Uotani K, Watanabe Y, Higashi M, Nakazawa T, Kono AK, Hori Y, Fukuda T, Kanzaki S, Yamada N, Itoh T, Sugimura K, Naito H.
    Eur Radiol; 2009 Aug; 19(8):2060-5. PubMed ID: 19277672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Dual energy CTA of the carotid bifurcation: advantage of plaque subtraction for assessment of grade of the stenosis and morphology.
    Korn A, Bender B, Thomas C, Danz S, Fenchel M, Nägele T, Heuschmid M, Ernemann U, Hauser TK.
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):e120-5. PubMed ID: 20833492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Automatic lumen segmentation in calcified plaques: dual-energy CT versus standard reconstructions in comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
    Thomas C, Korn A, Ketelsen D, Danz S, Tsifikas I, Claussen CD, Ernemann U, Heuschmid M.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jun; 194(6):1590-5. PubMed ID: 20489101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Evaluation of virtual monoenergetic imaging algorithms for dual-energy carotid and intracerebral CT angiography: Effects on image quality, artefacts and diagnostic performance for the detection of stenosis.
    Leithner D, Mahmoudi S, Wichmann JL, Martin SS, Lenga L, Albrecht MH, Booz C, Arendt CT, Beeres M, D'Angelo T, Bodelle B, Vogl TJ, Scholtz JE.
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Feb; 99():111-117. PubMed ID: 29362140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Grading of carotid artery stenosis in the presence of extensive calcifications: dual-energy CT angiography in comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    Korn A, Bender B, Brodoefel H, Hauser TK, Danz S, Ernemann U, Thomas C.
    Clin Neuroradiol; 2015 Mar; 25(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 24343701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Overestimation of carotid stenosis on CTA - Real world experience.
    Horev A, Honig A, Cohen JE, Goldbart A, Dizitzer Y, Star M, Gomori JM, Zlotnik Y, Ifergane G, Borodetsky V, Shelef I, Leker RR.
    J Clin Neurosci; 2021 Mar; 85():36-40. PubMed ID: 33581787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Detection of carotid artery stenosis using histological specimens: a comparison of CT angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and Doppler ultrasonography.
    Netuka D, Belšán T, Broulíková K, Mandys V, Charvát F, Malík J, Coufalová L, Bradáč O, Ostrý S, Beneš V.
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2016 Aug; 158(8):1505-14. PubMed ID: 27255656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [An evaluation of the carotid bifurcation and of the intracranial circle by angio-spiral computed tomography].
    Bozzao A, Floris R, Villani A, Varrucciu V, Baviera ME, Simonetti G.
    Radiol Med; 1998 Jun; 95(6):577-82. PubMed ID: 9717538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Heavily Calcified Coronary Arteries: Advanced Calcium Subtraction Improves Luminal Visualization and Diagnostic Confidence in Dual-Energy Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography.
    De Santis D, Jin KN, Schoepf UJ, Grant KL, De Cecco CN, Nance JW, Vogl TJ, Laghi A, Albrecht MH.
    Invest Radiol; 2018 Feb; 53(2):103-109. PubMed ID: 29016370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Submillisievert CT angiography for carotid arteries using wide array CT scanner and latest iterative reconstruction algorithm in comparison with previous generations technologies: Feasibility and diagnostic accuracy.
    Annoni AD, Montorsi P, Andreini D, Pontone G, Mancini ME, Muscogiuri G, Formenti A, Mushtaq S, Trabattoni P, Dainese L, Pepi M.
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2019 Feb; 13(3):41-47. PubMed ID: 30639115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Computed tomography angiography-derived area stenosis calculations overestimate degree of carotid stenosis compared with North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial-derived diameter stenosis calculations.
    Arous EJ, Judelson DR, Agrawal A, Dundamadappa SK, Crawford AS, Malka KT, Simons JP, Schanzer A.
    J Vasc Surg; 2021 Aug; 74(2):579-585.e2. PubMed ID: 33548432
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Diagnostic yield of 90-kVp low-tube-voltage carotid and intracerebral CT-angiography: effects on radiation dose, image quality and diagnostic performance for the detection of carotid stenosis.
    Leithner D, Wichmann JL, Mahmoudi S, Martin SS, Albrecht MH, Vogl TJ, Scholtz JE.
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Jun; 91(1086):20170927. PubMed ID: 29493282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. CT angiographic analysis of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of manual assessment, semiautomatic vessel analysis, and digital subtraction angiography.
    Silvennoinen HM, Ikonen S, Soinne L, Railo M, Valanne L.
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 17213433
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Correlation of Computed Tomography Angiography to Digital Subtraction Angiography in Carotid Stenosis with Real-World Assessment of Overestimation of Carotid Stenosis on Computed Tomography Angiography.
    Roy JM, Abbas R, Chong W, Muharemmi E, Hai Y, Morse C, El Naamani K, Atallah E, Herial NA, Tjoumakaris S, Gooch MR, Rosenwasser RH, Flanders A, Jabbour P.
    World Neurosurg; 2024 Sep; 189():e452-e458. PubMed ID: 38906473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 35.