These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

423 related items for PubMed ID: 28542553

  • 1. Quantitative MRI for analysis of peritumoral edema in malignant gliomas.
    Blystad I, Warntjes JBM, Smedby Ö, Lundberg P, Larsson EM, Tisell A.
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177135. PubMed ID: 28542553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Quantitative MRI using relaxometry in malignant gliomas detects contrast enhancement in peritumoral oedema.
    Blystad I, Warntjes JBM, Smedby Ö, Lundberg P, Larsson EM, Tisell A.
    Sci Rep; 2020 Oct 22; 10(1):17986. PubMed ID: 33093605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Dynamic contrast-enhanced and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging for glioma grading: Preliminary comparison of vessel compartment and permeability parameters using hotspot and histogram analysis.
    Santarosa C, Castellano A, Conte GM, Cadioli M, Iadanza A, Terreni MR, Franzin A, Bello L, Caulo M, Falini A, Anzalone N.
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun 22; 85(6):1147-56. PubMed ID: 27161065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Correlation between the degree of contrast enhancement and the volume of peritumoral edema in meningiomas and malignant gliomas.
    Holodny AI, Nusbaum AO, Festa S, Pronin IN, Lee HJ, Kalnin AJ.
    Neuroradiology; 1999 Nov 22; 41(11):820-5. PubMed ID: 10602854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficients and T2 relaxation times in characterizing contrast enhancing brain tumors and regions of peritumoral edema.
    Oh J, Cha S, Aiken AH, Han ET, Crane JC, Stainsby JA, Wright GA, Dillon WP, Nelson SJ.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Jun 22; 21(6):701-8. PubMed ID: 15906339
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Imaging ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxy glucose/¹¹C-methionine uptake decoupling for identification of tumor cell infiltration in peritumoral brain edema.
    Kinoshita M, Goto T, Arita H, Okita Y, Isohashi K, Kagawa N, Fujimoto Y, Kishima H, Shimosegawa E, Saitoh Y, Hatazawa J, Hashimoto N, Yoshimine T.
    J Neurooncol; 2012 Jan 22; 106(2):417-25. PubMed ID: 21847706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficients in the characterization of brain tumors and associated peritumoral edema.
    Server A, Kulle B, Maehlen J, Josefsen R, Schellhorn T, Kumar T, Langberg CW, Nakstad PH.
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Jul 22; 50(6):682-9. PubMed ID: 19449234
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Measurements of diagnostic examination performance using quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient and proton MR spectroscopic imaging in the preoperative evaluation of tumor grade in cerebral gliomas.
    Server A, Kulle B, Gadmar ØB, Josefsen R, Kumar T, Nakstad PH.
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov 22; 80(2):462-70. PubMed ID: 20708868
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Longitudinal DSC-MRI for Distinguishing Tumor Recurrence From Pseudoprogression in Patients With a High-grade Glioma.
    Boxerman JL, Ellingson BM, Jeyapalan S, Elinzano H, Harris RJ, Rogg JM, Pope WB, Safran H.
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2017 Jun 22; 40(3):228-234. PubMed ID: 25436828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Application of diffusion kurtosis imaging to the study of edema in solid and peritumoral areas of glioma.
    Qiu J, Deng K, Wang P, Chen C, Luo Y, Yuan S, Wen J.
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Feb 22; 86():10-16. PubMed ID: 34793876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. On differentiation between vasogenic edema and non-enhancing tumor in high-grade glioma patients using a support vector machine classifier based upon pre and post-surgery MRI images.
    Sengupta A, Agarwal S, Gupta PK, Ahlawat S, Patir R, Gupta RK, Singh A.
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep 22; 106():199-208. PubMed ID: 30150045
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Biopsy targeting gliomas: do functional imaging techniques identify similar target areas?
    Weber MA, Henze M, Tüttenberg J, Stieltjes B, Meissner M, Zimmer F, Burkholder I, Kroll A, Combs SE, Vogt-Schaden M, Giesel FL, Zoubaa S, Haberkorn U, Kauczor HU, Essig M.
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Dec 22; 45(12):755-68. PubMed ID: 20829706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Synthesizing a Contrast-Enhancement Map in Patients with High-Grade Gliomas Based on a Postcontrast MR Imaging Quantification Only.
    Warntjes M, Blystad I, Tisell A, Larsson EM.
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2018 Dec 22; 39(12):2194-2199. PubMed ID: 30409854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the distinction of high-grade cerebral gliomas from single metastatic brain tumors.
    Server A, Josefsen R, Kulle B, Maehlen J, Schellhorn T, Gadmar Ø, Kumar T, Haakonsen M, Langberg CW, Nakstad PH.
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Apr 22; 51(3):316-25. PubMed ID: 20092374
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Diffusion tensor imaging provides an insight into the microstructure of meningiomas, high-grade gliomas, and peritumoral edema.
    De Belder FE, Oot AR, Van Hecke W, Venstermans C, Menovsky T, Van Marck V, Van Goethem J, Van den Hauwe L, Vandekerckhove M, Parizel PM.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012 Apr 22; 36(5):577-82. PubMed ID: 22992609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Differentiation of Glioblastoma and Solitary Brain Metastasis by Gradient of Relative Cerebral Blood Volume in the Peritumoral Brain Zone Derived from Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    She D, Xing Z, Cao D.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2019 Apr 22; 43(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 30015801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.