These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
399 related items for PubMed ID: 28544320
1. Influence of radial versus femoral access site on coronary angiography and intervention outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brener MI, Bush A, Miller JM, Hasan RK. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Dec 01; 90(7):1093-1104. PubMed ID: 28544320 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Interventions Across the Entire Spectrum of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. Ferrante G, Rao SV, Jüni P, Da Costa BR, Reimers B, Condorelli G, Anzuini A, Jolly SS, Bertrand OF, Krucoff MW, Windecker S, Valgimigli M. JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jul 25; 9(14):1419-34. PubMed ID: 27372195 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Procedural Outcomes With Femoral, Radial, Distal Radial, and Ulnar Access for Coronary Angiography: A Network Meta-Analysis. Maqsood MH, Yong CM, Rao SV, Cohen MG, Pancholy S, Bangalore S. Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 Sep 25; 17(9):e014186. PubMed ID: 39027936 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Transulnar versus transradial access for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dahal K, Rijal J, Lee J, Korr KS, Azrin M. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr 25; 87(5):857-65. PubMed ID: 26332022 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of Sex on Comparative Outcomes of Radial Versus Femoral Access in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Invasive Management: Data From the Randomized MATRIX-Access Trial. Gargiulo G, Ariotti S, Vranckx P, Leonardi S, Frigoli E, Ciociano N, Tumscitz C, Tomassini F, Calabrò P, Garducci S, Crimi G, Andò G, Ferrario M, Limbruno U, Cortese B, Sganzerla P, Lupi A, Russo F, Garbo R, Ausiello A, Zavalloni D, Sardella G, Esposito G, Santarelli A, Tresoldi S, Nazzaro MS, Zingarelli A, Petronio AS, Windecker S, da Costa BR, Valgimigli M. JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jan 08; 11(1):36-50. PubMed ID: 29301646 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Radial vs femoral access for the prevention of acute kidney injury (AKI) after coronary angiography or intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Andò G, Gragnano F, Calabrò P, Valgimigli M. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Dec 01; 92(7):E518-E526. PubMed ID: 30244540 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock: A radial-first centre experience and meta-analysis of published studies. Roule V, Lemaitre A, Sabatier R, Lognoné T, Dahdouh Z, Berger L, Milliez P, Grollier G, Montalescot G, Beygui F. Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2015 Nov 01; 108(11):563-75. PubMed ID: 26365478 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Angiography/Intervention in Women With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the RIVAL Trial (Radial Vs femorAL access for coronary intervention). Pandie S, Mehta SR, Cantor WJ, Cheema AN, Gao P, Madan M, Niemela K, Rao SV, Schwalm JD, Valentin V, Velianou JL, Jolly SS. JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Apr 20; 8(4):505-12. PubMed ID: 25907080 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of manual compression and vascular hemostasis devices after coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention through femoral artery access: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dahal K, Rijal J, Shahukhal R, Sharma S, Watti H, Azrin M, Katikaneni P, Jimenez E, Tandon N, Modi K, Lee J. Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Mar 20; 19(2):151-162. PubMed ID: 28941744 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. How brachial access compares to femoral access for invasive cardiac angiography when radial access is not feasible: A meta-analysis. Mele M, Mele A, Cuculo A, Tricarico L, Liantonio A, Imbrici P, Santoro F, Brunetti ND. J Vasc Access; 2024 Jul 20; 25(4):1063-1068. PubMed ID: 36573696 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Arterial access site and outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with and without vorapaxar. Déry JP, Mahaffey KW, Tricoci P, White HD, Podder M, Westerhout CM, Moliterno DJ, Harrington RA, Chen E, Strony J, Van de Werf F, Ziada KM, Held C, Aylward PE, Armstrong PW, Rao SV. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Aug 20; 88(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 26698636 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of standard versus low dose heparin on access-related complications after coronary angiography through radial access: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dahal K, Sharma S, Yousuf A, Lee J, Azrin M, Jimenez E, Modi K, Tandon N. Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Aug 20; 19(5 Pt B):575-579. PubMed ID: 29223499 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison Between Radial Approach and Femoral Approach With Vascular Closure Devices on the Occurrence of Access-Site Complications and Periprocedural Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Rigattieri S, Sciahbasi A, Ratib K, Alonzo A, Cox N, Chodór P, Berni A, Fedele S, Pugliese FR, Cooper CJ, Louvard Y, Nolan J, Rao SV. J Invasive Cardiol; 2016 Dec 20; 28(12):473-479. PubMed ID: 27630147 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Vascular Access Site and Outcomes in 58,870 Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With a Previous History of Coronary Bypass Surgery: Results From the British Cardiovascular Interventions Society National Database. Kinnaird T, Anderson R, Gallagher S, Cockburn J, Sirker A, Ludman P, de Belder M, Copt S, Nolan J, Zaman A, Mamas M. JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Mar 12; 11(5):482-492. PubMed ID: 29519382 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]