These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

130 related items for PubMed ID: 2858044

  • 1. [The myth of the lucid interval. Evaluation of testability].
    Rasch W, Bayerl R.
    Lebensversicher Med; 1985 Jan 01; 37(1):2, 4, 6-8. PubMed ID: 2858044
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The ALI test for insanity: a re-examination.
    Miller GH.
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1983 Jan 01; 11(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 6850104
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Psychopathological studies in expert evaluation of the capacity to make a will (case studies)].
    Dedè G.
    Rass Neuropsichiatr; 1968 Jan 01; 22(3):315-39. PubMed ID: 5760281
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Problem of a test method assessment of simulation and dissimulation in forensic expert testimony].
    Szegedi M.
    Acta Med Leg Soc (Liege); 1986 Jan 01; 36(2):298-300. PubMed ID: 2979386
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Methodologic considerations of the competence of psychiatric and psychological experts for criminal cases (with regard to Penal Code I and II)].
    Haddenbrock S.
    Beitr Gerichtl Med; 1972 Jan 01; 29():17-25. PubMed ID: 5081971
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Expectations of the court psychiatrist toward the psychologist in expert testimony concerning responsibility].
    Huszar I.
    Acta Med Leg Soc (Liege); 1986 Jan 01; 36(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 2979369
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Professional secrecy in medical depositions and expert testimony on mental disorders].
    Rieger HJ.
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1986 Nov 14; 111(46):1775-6. PubMed ID: 3780441
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Non-responsibility under Section 51 of the Penal Code in light of medical science].
    Grömig H.
    Med Monatsschr; 1969 Mar 14; 23(3):115-7. PubMed ID: 5813569
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Neurological psychiatric medicolegal assessment].
    Widder B.
    Nervenarzt; 2011 Dec 14; 82(12):1523-4. PubMed ID: 22083281
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [The significance of standardized psychodiagnostic methods for the forensic psychiatric expert evaluation of primary intelligence disorders].
    Barbey I.
    Offentl Gesundheitswes; 1985 Jul 14; 47(7):301-4. PubMed ID: 2931639
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Basic problems in the pre-trial psychiatric tests].
    Nakayama K.
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 1979 Apr 25; 81(4):252-4. PubMed ID: 493418
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Testimony of the psychiatric expert from the viewpoint of the criminal judge].
    Schmitt B.
    Arch Kriminol; 1996 Apr 25; 198(1-2):38-54. PubMed ID: 8967830
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Ethical problems in forensic-psychiatric assessment].
    Barbey I.
    Psychiatr Prax; 1988 Sep 25; 15(5):176-81. PubMed ID: 3054984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [The forensic expert as author--text construction of psychiatric evaluation].
    Wolff S.
    Offentl Gesundheitswes; 1989 Sep 25; 51(8-9):522-8. PubMed ID: 2531344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.