These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

137 related items for PubMed ID: 28587476

  • 1. Do the New FDA Guidance Documents Help Improving Performance of Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Compared With ISO 15197?
    Freckmann G, Baumstark A, Pleus S.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1240-1246. PubMed ID: 28587476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Why the New FDA Glucose Meter POCT Guidance Is Disappointing.
    Krouwer JS.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1274. PubMed ID: 27923882
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Analytical Performance Requirements for Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose With Focus on System Accuracy: Relevant Differences Among ISO 15197:2003, ISO 15197:2013, and Current FDA Recommendations.
    Freckmann G, Schmid C, Baumstark A, Rutschmann M, Haug C, Heinemann L.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 9(4):885-94. PubMed ID: 25872965
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluation of Precision and Bias Specifications Required to Achieve the 2018 FDA Guidance Criteria for Glucose Meter Performance Using Simulation Models.
    Lyon AW, Lyon ME.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 May; 14(3):513-518. PubMed ID: 31752535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A Review of Blood Glucose Monitor Accuracy.
    King F, Ahn D, Hsiao V, Porco T, Klonoff DC.
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Dec; 20(12):843-856. PubMed ID: 30376362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Why the Diabetes Technology Society Surveillance Protocol for Glucose Meters Needs to Be Revised.
    Krouwer JS.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1247-1249. PubMed ID: 28376646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Alarm characterization for a continuous glucose monitor that replaces traditional blood glucose monitoring.
    McGarraugh G.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2010 Jan 01; 4(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 20167167
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Assessment of System Accuracy, Intermediate Measurement Precision, and Measurement Repeatability of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System Based on ISO 15197.
    Jendrike N, Baumstark A, Pleus S, Mende J, Haug C, Freckmann G.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2019 Mar 01; 13(2):235-241. PubMed ID: 30547683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. ISO 15197:2013 Accuracy Evaluation of Two CE-Marked Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose.
    Jendrike N, Rittmeyer D, Pleus S, Baumstark A, Haug C, Freckmann G.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul 01; 9(4):934-5. PubMed ID: 25901021
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.