These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

303 related items for PubMed ID: 28587489

  • 1. Laboratory evaluation of an optimised internet-based speech-in-noise test for occupational high-frequency hearing loss screening: Occupational Earcheck.
    Sheikh Rashid M, Leensen MCJ, de Laat JAPM, Dreschler WA.
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):844-853. PubMed ID: 28587489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The applicability of a speech-in-noise screening test in occupational hearing conservation.
    Leensen MC, Dreschler WA.
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):455-65. PubMed ID: 23772828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Exploring the sensitivity of speech-in-noise tests for noise-induced hearing loss.
    Jansen S, Luts H, Dejonckere P, van Wieringen A, Wouters J.
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 53(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 24237040
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Development and validation of the Leuven intelligibility sentence test with male speaker (LIST-m).
    Jansen S, Koning R, Wouters J, van Wieringen A.
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 24152309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of an internet-based speech-in-noise screening test for school-age children.
    Sheikh Rashid M, Dreschler WA, de Laat JAPM.
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):967-975. PubMed ID: 28936876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Development and evaluation of the British English coordinate response measure speech-in-noise test as an occupational hearing assessment tool.
    Semeraro HD, Rowan D, van Besouw RM, Allsopp AA.
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 56(10):749-758. PubMed ID: 28537138
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
    Wardenga N, Batsoulis C, Wagener KC, Brand T, Lenarz T, Maier H.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Oct; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 3: test sensitivity for uncontrolled parameters in domestic usage.
    Leensen MC, Dreschler WA.
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Oct; 52(10):658-69. PubMed ID: 23819619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D, Ahlstrom JB, Bologna WJ, Dubno JR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effect of Energy Equalization on the Intelligibility of Speech in Fluctuating Background Interference for Listeners With Hearing Impairment.
    D'Aquila LA, Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD.
    Trends Hear; 2017 Jun; 21():2331216517710354. PubMed ID: 28602128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The Just-Meaningful Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio.
    McShefferty D, Whitmer WM, Akeroyd MA.
    Trends Hear; 2016 Feb 01; 20():. PubMed ID: 26834121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Speech-in-noise measures: variable versus fixed speech and noise levels.
    Wilson RH, McArdle R.
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep 01; 51(9):708-12. PubMed ID: 22640687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation of the NAL Dynamic Conversations Test in older listeners with hearing loss.
    Best V, Keidser G, Freeston K, Buchholz JM.
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar 01; 57(3):221-229. PubMed ID: 28826285
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effect of companding on speech recognition in quiet and noise for listeners with ANSD.
    Narne VK, Barman A, Deepthi M.
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb 01; 53(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 24237041
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Development and validation of a smartphone-based digits-in-noise hearing test in South African English.
    Potgieter JM, Swanepoel de W, Myburgh HC, Hopper TC, Smits C.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul 01; 55(7):405-11. PubMed ID: 27121117
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Characterizing the Speech Reception Threshold in hearing-impaired listeners in relation to masker type and masker level.
    Rhebergen KS, Pool RE, Dreschler WA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar 01; 135(3):1491-505. PubMed ID: 24606285
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Sang J, Hu H, Zheng C, Li G, Lutman ME, Bleeck S.
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep 01; 327():175-85. PubMed ID: 26232529
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.