These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
391 related items for PubMed ID: 28598220
1. Bone and cortical bone thickness of mandibular buccal shelf for mini-screw insertion in adults. Nucera R, Lo Giudice A, Bellocchio AM, Spinuzza P, Caprioglio A, Perillo L, Matarese G, Cordasco G. Angle Orthod; 2017 Sep; 87(5):745-751. PubMed ID: 28598220 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Anatomic assessment of the mandibular buccal shelf for miniscrew insertion in white patients. Elshebiny T, Palomo JM, Baumgaertel S. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):505-511. PubMed ID: 29602342 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites. Farnsworth D, Rossouw PE, Ceen RF, Buschang PH. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 21457860 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone and cortical bone characteristics of mandibular retromolar trigone and anterior ramus region for miniscrew insertion in adults. Nucera R, Bellocchio AM, Oteri G, Farah AJ, Rosalia L, Giancarlo C, Portelli M. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Mar; 155(3):330-338. PubMed ID: 30826035 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. CBCT comparison of buccal shelf bone thickness in adult Dravidian population at various sites, depths and angulation - A retrospective study. Sreenivasagan S, Sivakumar A. Int Orthod; 2021 Sep; 19(3):471-479. PubMed ID: 34172417 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative evaluation of maxillary interradicular bone with cone-beam computed tomography for bicortical placement of orthodontic mini-implants. Yang L, Li F, Cao M, Chen H, Wang X, Chen X, Yang L, Gao W, Petrone JF, Ding Y. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):725-37. PubMed ID: 26038077 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular spaces and cortical bone thickness for the placement and initial stability of microimplants in adults. Park J, Cho HJ. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):314.e1-12; discussion 314-5. PubMed ID: 19732658 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Preliminary cone-beam computed tomography study evaluating dental and skeletal changes after treatment with a mandibular Schwarz appliance. Tai K, Hotokezaka H, Park JH, Tai H, Miyajima K, Choi M, Kai LM, Mishima K. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):262.e1-262.e11; discussion 262-3. PubMed ID: 20816294 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimal sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement assessed by cone beam computed tomography. Fayed MM, Pazera P, Katsaros C. Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):939-51. PubMed ID: 20578867 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants. Deguchi T, Nasu M, Murakami K, Yabuuchi T, Kamioka H, Takano-Yamamoto T. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):721.e7-12. PubMed ID: 16769488 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional tomographic mapping related to primary stability and structural miniscrew characteristics. Silvestrini Biavati A, Tecco S, Migliorati M, Festa F, Panza G, Marzo G, Gherlone E, Tetè S. Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 May; 14(2):88-99. PubMed ID: 21457458 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Buccal bone thickness of posterior mandible for microscrews implantation in molar distalization. Wang Y, Sun J, Shi Y, Li X, Wang Z. Ann Anat; 2022 Oct; 244():151993. PubMed ID: 36041697 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The anatomical evaluation of the dental arches using cone beam computed tomography--an investigation of the availability of bone for placement of mini-screws. Pan F, Kau CH, Zhou H, Souccar N. Head Face Med; 2013 Apr 20; 9():13. PubMed ID: 23601073 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A digital volumetric tomography (DVT) study in the mandibular molar region for miniscrew placement during mixed dentition. Bhattad MS, Baliga S, Vibhute P. Dental Press J Orthod; 2015 Apr 20; 20(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 25992988 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of orthodontic mini-implant placement: a CBCT study. Kalra S, Tripathi T, Rai P, Kanase A. Prog Orthod; 2014 Nov 18; 15(1):61. PubMed ID: 25406652 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone dimensions in the posterior mandible: a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Part 1--analysis of dentate sites. Braut V, Bornstein MM, Lauber R, Buser D. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Apr 18; 32(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 22292147 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study between currently used methods and Small Volume-Cone Beam Tomography for surgical placement of mini implants. Landin M, Jadhav A, Yadav S, Tadinada A. Angle Orthod; 2015 May 18; 85(3):446-53. PubMed ID: 25343688 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of mandibular buccal shelf bone characteristics between two facial types using cone beam computed tomography. Ramasamy P, Sabrish S, Pattabiraman V, Shivamurthy PG, Sagarkar R, Mathew S. Indian J Dent Res; 2022 May 18; 33(3):277-281. PubMed ID: 36656188 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary and mandibular interradicular sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement. Lim JE, Lee SJ, Kim YJ, Lim WH, Chun YS. Orthod Craniofac Res; 2009 Nov 18; 12(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 19840282 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of mandibular buccal shelf morphology between adolescents and adults with different vertical patterns using CBCT. Fang X, Ding H, Fan C, Pang L, Xu T, Liu J, Jiang C. Oral Radiol; 2024 Jan 18; 40(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 37773481 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]