These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

341 related items for PubMed ID: 28601246

  • 1. Clinical Outcome of Medial Pivot Compared With Press-Fit Condylar Sigma Cruciate-Retaining Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS.
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Oct; 32(10):3016-3023. PubMed ID: 28601246
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Long-term clinical outcomes and survivorship of press-fit condylar sigma fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee prostheses in the same patients.
    Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS, Kulkarni SS, Kim YH.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Oct 01; 96(19):e168. PubMed ID: 25274796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Functional outcome and range of motion of high-flexion posterior cruciate-retaining and high-flexion posterior cruciate-substituting total knee prostheses. A prospective, randomized study.
    Kim YH, Choi Y, Kwon OR, Kim JS.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Apr 01; 91(4):753-60. PubMed ID: 19339558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Early outcome of TKA with a medial pivot fixed-bearing prosthesis is worse than with a PFC mobile-bearing prosthesis.
    Kim YH, Yoon SH, Kim JS.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2009 Feb 01; 467(2):493-503. PubMed ID: 18465188
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of the low contact stress and press fit condylar rotating-platform mobile-bearing prostheses in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study.
    Kim YH, Kim JS, Park JW, Joo JH.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Jun 01; 93(11):1001-7. PubMed ID: 21655893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. No differences in patient-reported outcomes between medial pivot insert and symmetrical insert in total knee arthroplasty: A randomized analysis.
    Nishitani K, Furu M, Nakamura S, Kuriyama S, Ishikawa M, Ito H, Matsuda S.
    Knee; 2018 Dec 01; 25(6):1254-1261. PubMed ID: 30209014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A comparison of clinical- and patient-reported outcomes of the cemented ATTUNE and PFC sigma fixed bearing cruciate sacrificing knee systems in patients who underwent total knee replacement with both prostheses in opposite knees.
    Carey BW, Harty J.
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Mar 15; 13(1):54. PubMed ID: 29544516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. P.F.C Sigma® cruciate retaining fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing knee arthroplasty: a prospective comparative study with minimum 10-year follow-up.
    Riaz O, Aqil A, Sisodia G, Chakrabarty G.
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2017 Dec 15; 27(8):1145-1149. PubMed ID: 28210821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Patellar clunk syndrome in fixed-bearing posterior-stabilised versus cruciate-substituting prostheses.
    Tang YH, Wong WK, Wong HL.
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2014 Apr 15; 22(1):80-3. PubMed ID: 24781620
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Early Patellofemoral Function of Medial Pivot Prostheses Compared with Posterior-Stabilized Prostheses for Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Wang Z, Zhang YQ, Ding CR, Wang YZ, Xu H.
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Apr 15; 13(2):417-425. PubMed ID: 33403815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. No Difference in Postoperative Knee Flexion and Patient Joint Awareness Between Cruciate-Substituting and Cruciate-Retaining Medial Pivot Total Knee Prostheses: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study.
    Ueyama H, Kanemoto N, Minoda Y, Yamamoto N, Taniguchi Y, Nakamura H.
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Feb 15; 37(2):279-285. PubMed ID: 34793858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Knee range of motion during the first two years after use of posterior cruciate-stabilizing or posterior cruciate-retaining total knee prostheses. A randomized clinical trial.
    Chaudhary R, Beaupré LA, Johnston DW.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Dec 15; 90(12):2579-86. PubMed ID: 19047702
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Are Midterm Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Between Rotating-Platform Mobile-Bearing Prosthesis and Medial-Pivot Prosthesis Different? A Minimum of 5-Year Follow-Up Study.
    Choi NY, In Y, Bae JH, Do JH, Chung SJ, Koh IJ.
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Mar 15; 32(3):824-829. PubMed ID: 27667531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Range of motion in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of high-flexion and standard cruciate-retaining designs.
    Seon JK, Park SJ, Lee KB, Yoon TR, Kozanek M, Song EK.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Mar 01; 91(3):672-9. PubMed ID: 19255229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy.
    Hernigou P, Huys M, Pariat J, Roubineau F, Flouzat Lachaniette CH, Dubory A.
    Int Orthop; 2018 Feb 01; 42(2):317-322. PubMed ID: 28667383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Anteroposterior translation and range of motion after total knee arthroplasty using posterior cruciate ligament-retaining versus posterior cruciate ligament-substituting prostheses.
    Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Sato J, Sakurai T, Toyabe SI.
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Nov 01; 25(11):3536-3542. PubMed ID: 27485124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.