These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

149 related items for PubMed ID: 28606168

  • 1. Direct cost comparison of minimally invasive punch technique versus traditional approaches for percutaneous bone anchored hearing devices.
    Sardiwalla Y, Jufas N, Morris DP.
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Jun 12; 46(1):46. PubMed ID: 28606168
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery compared to the linear incision technique without soft tissue reduction for bone conduction hearing implants: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Calon TG, van Hoof M, van den Berge H, de Bruijn AJ, van Tongeren J, Hof JR, Brunings JW, Jonhede S, Anteunis LJ, Janssen M, Joore MA, Holmberg M, Johansson ML, Stokroos RJ.
    Trials; 2016 Nov 09; 17(1):540. PubMed ID: 27829464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Surgical and audiological results of bone-anchored hearing aids: comparison of two surgical techniques.
    Amaral MSAD, Santos FRD, Danieli F, Massuda ET, Reis ACMB, Hyppolito MA.
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Nov 09; 88(4):533-538. PubMed ID: 32888895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Health Economic Cost Analysis for Percutaneous Bone Conduction Devices: The Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery Versus Linear Incision Technique with Tissue Preservation.
    Strijbos RM, Straatman LV, Stegeman I, Holmberg M, Johansson ML, Stokroos RJ.
    Otol Neurotol; 2023 Aug 01; 44(7):709-717. PubMed ID: 37400140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A minimally invasive technique for the implantation of bone-anchored hearing devices.
    Wilson DF, Kim HH.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Sep 01; 149(3):473-7. PubMed ID: 23740414
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Osseointegrated Auditory Implants: A Comparison of Linear versus Punch Techniques.
    Gordon SA, Coelho DH.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Jun 01; 152(6):1089-93. PubMed ID: 25715352
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison between linear incision and punch techniques for bone anchored hearing aid surgery.
    De Stefano S, Mochi P, Murri A, Cuda D.
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2021 Oct 01; 41(5):474-480. PubMed ID: 34734584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Punch and Drill: Implantation of Bone Anchored Hearing Device Through a Minimal Skin Punch Incision Versus Implantation With Dermatome and Soft Tissue Reduction.
    Dumon T, Medina M, Sperling NM.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2016 Mar 01; 125(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 26384503
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Controlled Clinical Trial on Bone-anchored Hearing Implants and a Surgical Technique With Soft-tissue Preservation.
    den Besten CA, Bosman AJ, Nelissen RC, Mylanus EA, Hol MK.
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Jun 01; 37(5):504-12. PubMed ID: 26945315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Six-Month Clinical Outcomes for Bone-Anchored Hearing Implants: Comparison Between Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery and the Linear Incision Technique With Tissue Preservation.
    Caspers CJI, Kruyt IJ, Mylanus EAM, Hol MKS.
    Otol Neurotol; 2020 Apr 01; 41(4):e475-e483. PubMed ID: 32176135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. First Report: Linear Incision for Placement of a Magnetically Coupled Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant.
    Barry JY, Reghunathan S, Jacob A.
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Feb 01; 38(2):221-224. PubMed ID: 28068302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Punch vs open surgical techniques for placement of bone-anchored hearing implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of skin reactions and operating time.
    Xiao Q, Gong F, Wang N, Hu W.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Sep 01; 278(9):3171-3180. PubMed ID: 33389004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Short-term results from seventy-six patients receiving a bone-anchored hearing implant installed with a novel minimally invasive surgery technique.
    Johansson ML, Stokroos RJ, Banga R, Hol MK, Mylanus EA, Savage Jones H, Tysome JR, Vannucchi P, Hof JR, Brunings JW, van Tongeren J, Lutgert RW, Banerjee A, Windfuhr JP, Caruso A, Giannuzzi AL, Bordin S, Hanif J, Schart-Morén N, Singam S, Jonhede S, Holmberg M, Cremers CW, Hultcrantz M.
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2017 Oct 01; 42(5):1043-1048. PubMed ID: 27930877
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.