These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


201 related items for PubMed ID: 28627219

  • 1. Accuracy Assessment of an Improved Version of an Established Blood Glucose Monitoring System for Self-Testing Following ISO 15197:2013.
    Kamecke U, Baumstark A, Jendrike N, Haug C, Freckmann G.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Jul; 11(4):851-853. PubMed ID: 28627219
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Accuracy Evaluation of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System According to EN ISO 15197:2015.
    Bright D, Dunseath G, Berti F, Scuffi C, Valgimigli F, Luzio S.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Jul; 11(4):849-850. PubMed ID: 28745087
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. System Accuracy and User Performance Evaluation of an Improved System for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose.
    Baumstark A, Jendrike N, Liebing C, Haug C, Freckmann G.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2018 Mar; 12(2):407-411. PubMed ID: 29291625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Performance Evaluation of Three Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Using ISO 15197: 2013 Accuracy Criteria, Consensus and Surveillance Error Grid Analyses, and Insulin Dosing Error Modeling in a Hospital Setting.
    Bedini JL, Wallace JF, Pardo S, Petruschke T.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Oct 07; 10(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 26445813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The FDA reevaluates alternative site testing for blood glucose.
    Ginsberg BH.
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2002 Oct 07; 4(3):347-9. PubMed ID: 12165174
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. New Generation Blood Glucose Monitoring System Exceeds International Accuracy Standards.
    Brazg RL, Klaff LJ, Sussman AM.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Nov 07; 10(6):1414-1415. PubMed ID: 27271844
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Analytical Performance Requirements for Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose With Focus on System Accuracy: Relevant Differences Among ISO 15197:2003, ISO 15197:2013, and Current FDA Recommendations.
    Freckmann G, Schmid C, Baumstark A, Rutschmann M, Haug C, Heinemann L.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul 07; 9(4):885-94. PubMed ID: 25872965
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.