These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

208 related items for PubMed ID: 28629568

  • 1. Repeatability of estimated fetal weight: Comparison between MR imaging versus 2D ultrasound in at- and near-term patients.
    Kadji C, Camus MF, Bevilacqua E, Cannie MM, Sanchez TC, Jani JC.
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Jun; 91():35-40. PubMed ID: 28629568
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Prenatal prediction of small-for-gestational age neonates using MR imaging: comparison with conventional 2D ultrasound.
    Carlin A, Kadji C, De Angelis R, Cannie MM, Jani JC.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 May; 32(10):1673-1681. PubMed ID: 29212395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Prenatal prediction of postnatal large-for-dates neonates using a simplified MRI method: comparison with conventional 2D ultrasound estimates.
    Kadji C, Cannie MM, De Angelis R, Camus M, Klass M, Fellas S, Cecotti V, Dütemeyer V, Jani JC.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 52(2):250-257. PubMed ID: 28508549
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Impact of operator experience on the variability of fetal lung volume estimation by 3D-ultrasound (VOCAL) and magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.
    Strizek B, Cos Sanchez T, Khalifé J, Jani J, Cannie M.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 May; 28(7):858-64. PubMed ID: 24946026
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Prediction of fetal macrosomia using two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound.
    Mazzone E, Dall'Asta A, Kiener AJO, Carpano MG, Suprani A, Ghi T, Frusca T.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Dec; 243():26-31. PubMed ID: 31670065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A Longitudinal Study on Fetal Weight Estimation at Third Trimester of Pregnancy: Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and 2-D Ultrasound Predictions.
    Kadji C, Cannie MM, Van Wettere M, Bevilacqua E, Dütemeyer V, Strizek B, Khalifé J, Kang X, Jani JC.
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2017 Dec; 42(3):181-188. PubMed ID: 28407631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Estimation of fetal weight by measurement of fetal thigh soft-tissue thickness in the late third trimester.
    Scioscia M, Scioscia F, Vimercati A, Caradonna F, Nardelli C, Pinto LR, Selvaggi LE.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 31(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 18307214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Biometry and fetal weight estimation by two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasonography: an intraobserver and interobserver reliability and agreement study.
    Lima JC, Miyague AH, Filho FM, Nastri CO, Martins WP.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Aug; 40(2):186-93. PubMed ID: 22102507
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Blinded ultrasound fetal biometry at 36 weeks and risk of emergency Cesarean delivery in a prospective cohort study of low-risk nulliparous women.
    Sovio U, Smith GCS.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 28452133
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The Use of a Software-Assisted Method to Estimate Fetal Weight at and Near Term Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Kadji C, De Groof M, Camus MF, De Angelis R, Fellas S, Klass M, Cecotti V, Dütemeyer V, Barakat E, Cannie MM, Jani JC.
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2017 Jul; 41(4):307-313. PubMed ID: 28355605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of automated vs. manual measurement to estimate fetal weight in isolated polyhydramnios.
    Eroglu H, Orgul G, Avcı E, Altınboga O, Karakoc G, Yucel A.
    J Perinat Med; 2019 Aug 27; 47(6):592-597. PubMed ID: 31141491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Fetal weight estimation: comparison of two-dimensional US and MR imaging assessments.
    Kacem Y, Cannie MM, Kadji C, Dobrescu O, Lo Zito L, Ziane S, Strizek B, Evrard AS, Gubana F, Gucciardo L, Staelens R, Jani JC.
    Radiology; 2013 Jun 27; 267(3):902-10. PubMed ID: 23329652
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility and generalizability of first trimester uterine artery pulsatility index by transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound.
    Marchi L, Zwertbroek E, Snelder J, Kloosterman M, Bilardo CM.
    Prenat Diagn; 2016 Dec 27; 36(13):1261-1269. PubMed ID: 27862084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate by third-trimester fetal biometry and impact of ultrasound-delivery interval.
    Reboul Q, Delabaere A, Luo ZC, Nuyt AM, Wu Y, Chauleur C, Fraser W, Audibert F.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar 27; 49(3):372-378. PubMed ID: 27153518
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Determination of fetal body volume measurement at term with magnetic resonance imaging: effect of various factors.
    Lo Zito L, Kadji C, Cannie M, Kacem Y, Strizek B, Mbonyumutwa M, Wuyts F, Jani J.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Aug 27; 26(12):1254-8. PubMed ID: 23413841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Ultrasonic fetal weight estimation: analysis of inter- and intra-observer variability.
    Chang TC, Robson SC, Spencer JA, Gallivan S.
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1993 Oct 27; 21(8):515-9. PubMed ID: 8270670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Fetal weight estimation by automated three-dimensional limb volume model in late third trimester compared to two-dimensional model: a cross-sectional prospective observational study.
    Wu X, Niu Z, Xu Z, Jiang Y, Zhang Y, Meng H, Ouyang Y.
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 May 08; 21(1):365. PubMed ID: 33964891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight: development of new model and assessment of performance of previous models.
    Hammami A, Mazer Zumaeta A, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul 08; 52(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 29611251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Fetal biometry by an inexperienced operator using two- and three-dimensional ultrasound.
    Yang F, Leung KY, Lee YP, Chan HY, Tang MH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 May 08; 35(5):566-71. PubMed ID: 20183864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Using Akaike information criterion and minimum mean square error mode in compensating for ultrasonographic errors for estimation of fetal weight by new operators.
    Cheng YC, Chiu YH, Wang HC, Chang FM, Chung KC, Chang CH, Cheng KS.
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar 08; 52(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 23548217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.