These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

198 related items for PubMed ID: 28631080

  • 1. Comparison of volumetric and functional parameters in simultaneous cardiac PET/MR: feasibility of volumetric assessment with residual activity from prior PET/CT.
    Lücke C, Oppolzer B, Werner P, Foldyna B, Lurz P, Jochimsen T, Brenneis B, Lehmkuhl L, Sattler B, Grothoff M, Barthel H, Sabri O, Gutberlet M.
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Dec; 27(12):5146-5157. PubMed ID: 28631080
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Assessment of left and right ventricular functional parameters using dynamic dual-tracer [13N]NH3 and [18F]FDG PET/MRI.
    Rasul S, Beitzke D, Wollenweber T, Rausch I, Lassen ML, Stelzmüller ME, Mitterhauser M, Pichler V, Beyer T, Loewe C, Hacker M.
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2022 Jun; 29(3):1003-1017. PubMed ID: 33094471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Gated cardiac 13N-NH3 PET for assessment of left ventricular volumes, mass, and ejection fraction: comparison with electrocardiography-gated 18F-FDG PET.
    Khorsand A, Graf S, Eidherr H, Wadsak W, Kletter K, Sochor H, Schuster E, Porenta G.
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Dec; 46(12):2009-13. PubMed ID: 16330564
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of LVEF assessed by 2D echocardiography, gated blood pool SPECT, 99mTc tetrofosmin gated SPECT, and 18F-FDG gated PET with ERNV in patients with CAD and severe LV dysfunction.
    Raja S, Mittal BR, Santhosh S, Bhattacharya A, Rohit MK.
    Nucl Med Commun; 2014 Nov; 35(11):1156-61. PubMed ID: 25144559
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Measurement of left ventricular volumes and function with O-15-labeled carbon monoxide gated positron emission tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Hofman HA, Knaapen P, Boellaard R, Bondarenko O, Götte MJ, van Dockum WG, Visser CA, van Rossum AC, Lammertsma AA, Visser FC.
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2005 Nov; 12(6):639-44. PubMed ID: 16344225
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Gated F-18 FDG PET for assessment of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using QGS and 4D-MSPECT in patients with heart failure: a comparison with cardiac MRI.
    Li Y, Wang L, Zhao SH, He ZX, Wang DY, Guo F, Fang W, Yang MF.
    PLoS One; 2014 Nov; 9(1):e80227. PubMed ID: 24404123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Validation of QGS and 4D-MSPECT for quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction from gated 18F-FDG PET: comparison with cardiac MRI.
    Schaefer WM, Lipke CS, Nowak B, Kaiser HJ, Reinartz P, Buecker A, Krombach GA, Buell U, Kühl HP.
    J Nucl Med; 2004 Jan; 45(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 14734676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of PET and CMR for the measurement of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: a system review and meta-analysis.
    Ye Y, Yang Y, Gong J, Shao WW, Yu CX.
    Nucl Med Commun; 2022 Nov 01; 43(11):1143-1154. PubMed ID: 36120812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of gated PET with MRI for evaluation of left ventricular function in patients with coronary artery disease.
    Slart RH, Bax JJ, de Jong RM, de Boer J, Lamb HJ, Mook PH, Willemsen AT, Vaalburg W, van Veldhuisen DJ, Jager PL.
    J Nucl Med; 2004 Feb 01; 45(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 14960633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Left ventricular function and volumes from gated [13N]-ammonia positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging: A prospective head-to-head comparison against CMR using a hybrid PET/MR device.
    Maurer A, Sustar A, Giannopoulos AA, Grünig H, Bakula A, Patriki D, von Felten E, Messerli M, Pazhenkottil AP, Gebhard C, Kaufmann PA, Buechel RR, Fuchs TA.
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2023 Apr 01; 30(2):616-625. PubMed ID: 35819716
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Assessment of left ventricular volumes, ejection fraction and mass. Comparison of model-based analysis of ECG-gated (⁹⁹m)Tc-SPECT and ¹⁸F-FDG-PET.
    Khorsand A, Gyöngyösi M, Sochor H, Maurer G, Karanikas G, Dudczak R, Schuster E, Porenta G, Graf S.
    Nuklearmedizin; 2011 Apr 01; 50(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 21165540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Validation of an evaluation routine for left ventricular volumes, ejection fraction and wall motion from gated cardiac FDG PET: a comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
    Schaefer WM, Lipke CS, Nowak B, Kaiser HJ, Buecker A, Krombach GA, Buell U, Kühl HP.
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Apr 01; 30(4):545-53. PubMed ID: 12589480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Reproducibility of Left Ventricular Function Derived From Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Gated 13N-Ammonia Positron Emission Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: A Head-to-Head Comparison Using Hybrid Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance.
    Sager DF, Manz N, Manser S, Laubscher L, Stark AW, Schütze J, Heiniger PS, Markendorf S, Kaufmann PA, Gräni C, Buechel RR.
    Acad Radiol; 2024 Apr 01; 31(4):1248-1255. PubMed ID: 37940426
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of right ventricular volume and ejection fraction by gated (18)F-FDG PET in patients with pulmonary hypertension: comparison with cardiac MRI and CT.
    Wang L, Zhang Y, Yan C, He J, Xiong C, Zhao S, Fang W.
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2013 Apr 01; 20(2):242-52. PubMed ID: 23354658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Left-ventricular volumes and ejection fraction from cardiac ECG-gated 15O-water positron emission tomography compared to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using simultaneous hybrid PET/MR.
    Nordström J, Kvernby S, Kero T, Sörensen J, Harms HJ, Lubberink M.
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2023 Aug 01; 30(4):1352-1362. PubMed ID: 36482239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Feasibility of New Transthoracic Three-Dimensional Echocardiographic Automated Software for Left Heart Chamber Quantification in Children.
    Amadieu R, Hadeed K, Jaffro M, Karsenty C, Ratsimandresy M, Dulac Y, Acar P.
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2019 Jan 01; 32(1):121-134.e1. PubMed ID: 30241929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The impacts of severe perfusion defects, akinetic/dyskinetic segments, and viable myocardium on the accuracy of volumes and LVEF measured by gated ⁹⁹mTc-MIBI SPECT and gated ¹⁸F-FDG PET in patients with left ventricular aneurysm: cardiac magnetic resonance imaging as the reference.
    Wei H, Tian C, Schindler TH, Qiu M, Lu M, Shen R, Tian Y, Zhao SH, Zhang X.
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2014 Dec 01; 21(6):1230-44. PubMed ID: 25189143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Positron emission tomography in the assessment of left ventricular function in healthy rats: a comparison of four imaging methods.
    Todica A, Böning G, Lehner S, Weidl E, Cumming P, Wängler C, Nekolla SG, Schwaiger M, Bartenstein P, Schirrmacher R, Hacker M.
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2013 Apr 01; 20(2):262-74. PubMed ID: 23255241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of left ventricular dysfunction using multiphasic reconstructions of coronary multi-slice computed tomography data in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease: validation against cine magnetic resonance imaging.
    Halliburton SS, Petersilka M, Schvartzman PR, Obuchowski N, White RD.
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2003 Feb 01; 19(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 12602485
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Towards standardization of positron emission testing with computed tomography myocardial perfusion volumes and left ventricular ejection fraction: comparison with cardiac MRI.
    Dong TA, Abadie BQ, Hutt Centeno E, Jellis CL, Cremer PC, Jaber WA.
    Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract; 2023 May 01; 1(1):qyad006. PubMed ID: 39044793
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.