These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
312 related items for PubMed ID: 28676280
21. Baseline Age and Mean Deviation Affect the Rate of Glaucomatous Vision Loss. Bommakanti N, De Moraes CG, Boland MV, Myers JS, Wellik SR, Elze T, Pasquale LR, Shen LQ, Ritch R, Liebmann JM. J Glaucoma; 2020 Jan; 29(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 31688371 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The Association Between Intraocular Pressure and Visual Field Worsening in Treated Glaucoma Patients. Yohannan J, Boland MV, Ramulu P. J Glaucoma; 2021 Sep 01; 30(9):759-768. PubMed ID: 34172633 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. A new index to monitor central visual field progression in glaucoma. de Moraes CG, Furlanetto RL, Ritch R, Liebmann JM. Ophthalmology; 2014 Aug 01; 121(8):1531-8. PubMed ID: 24726202 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Flicker defined form perimetry in glaucoma suspects with normal achromatic visual fields. Reznicek L, Lamparter J, Vogel M, Kampik A, Hirneiß C. Curr Eye Res; 2015 Jul 01; 40(7):683-9. PubMed ID: 25207744 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Multiple (frontloaded) visual field tests increase identification of very slow mean deviation progression in glaucoma. Phu J, Tan J, Kalloniatis M. Can J Ophthalmol; 2024 Oct 01; 59(5):311-323. PubMed ID: 37652089 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Portsmouth visual field database: an audit of glaucoma progression. Kirwan JF, Hustler A, Bobat H, Toms L, Crabb DP, McNaught AI. Eye (Lond); 2014 Aug 01; 28(8):974-9. PubMed ID: 24875227 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Greater Physical Activity Is Associated with Slower Visual Field Loss in Glaucoma. Lee MJ, Wang J, Friedman DS, Boland MV, De Moraes CG, Ramulu PY. Ophthalmology; 2019 Jul 01; 126(7):958-964. PubMed ID: 30315900 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Factors that influence standard automated perimetry test results in glaucoma: test reliability, technician experience, time of day, and season. Junoy Montolio FG, Wesselink C, Gordijn M, Jansonius NM. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Oct 09; 53(11):7010-7. PubMed ID: 22952121 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Reliability of computerized perimetric threshold tests as assessed by reliability indices and threshold reproducibility in patients with suspect and manifest glaucoma. Bengtsson B. Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2000 Oct 09; 78(5):519-22. PubMed ID: 11037906 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of Humphrey Field Analyzer and imo visual field test results in patients with glaucoma and pseudo-fixation loss. Goukon H, Hirasawa K, Kasahara M, Matsumura K, Shoji N. PLoS One; 2019 Oct 09; 14(11):e0224711. PubMed ID: 31697732 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Pointwise linear regression analysis for detection of visual field progression with absolute versus corrected threshold sensitivities. Manassakorn A, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Koucheki B, Law SK, Caprioli J. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jul 09; 47(7):2896-903. PubMed ID: 16799031 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Defining 10-2 visual field progression criteria: exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis using pointwise linear regression. de Moraes CG, Song C, Liebmann JM, Simonson JL, Furlanetto RL, Ritch R. Ophthalmology; 2014 Mar 09; 121(3):741-9. PubMed ID: 24290806 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Measuring Rates of Visual Field Progression in Linear Versus Nonlinear Scales: Implications for Understanding the Relationship Between Baseline Damage and Target Rates of Glaucoma Progression. Liebmann K, De Moraes CG, Liebmann JM. J Glaucoma; 2017 Aug 09; 26(8):721-725. PubMed ID: 28692594 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]