These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

303 related items for PubMed ID: 28687057

  • 1. Factors influencing speech perception in noise for 5-year-old children using hearing aids or cochlear implants.
    Ching TY, Zhang VW, Flynn C, Burns L, Button L, Hou S, McGhie K, Van Buynder P.
    Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(sup2):S70-S80. PubMed ID: 28687057
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Spoken language and everyday functioning in 5-year-old children using hearing aids or cochlear implants.
    Cupples L, Ching TY, Button L, Seeto M, Zhang V, Whitfield J, Gunnourie M, Martin L, Marnane V.
    Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(sup2):S55-S69. PubMed ID: 28899200
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Learning from the Longitudinal Outcomes of Children with Hearing Impairment (LOCHI) study: summary of 5-year findings and implications.
    Ching TYC, Dillon H, Leigh G, Cupples L.
    Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(sup2):S105-S111. PubMed ID: 29020839
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Language and speech outcomes of children with hearing loss and additional disabilities: identifying the variables that influence performance at five years of age.
    Cupples L, Ching TYC, Button L, Leigh G, Marnane V, Whitfield J, Gunnourie M, Martin L.
    Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(sup2):S93-S104. PubMed ID: 27630013
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Speech perception in Mandarin-speaking children with cochlear implants: A systematic review.
    Chen Y, Wong LLN.
    Int J Audiol; 2017 May; 56(sup2):S7-S16. PubMed ID: 28296526
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Psychosocial Development in 5-Year-Old Children With Hearing Loss Using Hearing Aids or Cochlear Implants.
    Wong CL, Ching TYC, Cupples L, Button L, Leigh G, Marnane V, Whitfield J, Gunnourie M, Martin L.
    Trends Hear; 2017 May; 21():2331216517710373. PubMed ID: 28752809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Improving speech-in-noise recognition for children with hearing loss: potential effects of language abilities, binaural summation, and head shadow.
    Nittrouer S, Caldwell-Tarr A, Tarr E, Lowenstein JH, Rice C, Moberly AC.
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Aug; 52(8):513-25. PubMed ID: 23834373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB, Riss D, Liepins R, Rader T, Keck T, Keintzel T, Kaider A, Baumgartner WD, Gstoettner W, Arnoldner C.
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Longitudinal outcomes of children with hearing impairment (LOCHI): 5 year data.
    Cowan RSC, Edwards B, Ching TYC.
    Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(sup2):S1-S2. PubMed ID: 29914318
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The influence of voice quality and multi-talker babble noise on sentence processing and recall performance in school children using cochlear implant and/or hearing aids.
    Jonas Brännström K, von Lochow H, Lyberg-Åhlander V, Sahlén B.
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2019 Jul; 44(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 30204510
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Spatial release from masking in normal-hearing children and children who use hearing aids.
    Ching TY, van Wanrooy E, Dillon H, Carter L.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):368-75. PubMed ID: 21303017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Programming characteristics of cochlear implants in children: effects of aetiology and age at implantation.
    Incerti PV, Ching TYC, Hou S, Van Buynder P, Flynn C, Cowan R.
    Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(sup2):S27-S40. PubMed ID: 28885072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Hearing aid fitting and developmental outcomes of children fit according to either the NAL or DSL prescription: fit-to-target, audibility, speech and language abilities.
    Ching TYC, Zhang VW, Johnson EE, Van Buynder P, Hou S, Burns L, Button L, Flynn C, McGhie K.
    Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(sup2):S41-S54. PubMed ID: 28971727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Psychoacoustic and phoneme identification measures in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.
    Goldsworthy RL, Delhorne LA, Braida LD, Reed CM.
    Trends Amplif; 2013 Mar; 17(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 23429419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing.
    Zamaninezhad L, Hohmann V, Büchner A, Schädler MR, Jürgens T.
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The relationship between binaural benefit and difference in unilateral speech recognition performance for bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Yoon YS, Li Y, Kang HY, Fu QJ.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):554-65. PubMed ID: 21696329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Lexical tone recognition in noise in normal-hearing children and prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.
    Mao Y, Xu L.
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Aug; 56(sup2):S23-S30. PubMed ID: 27564095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Parent perceptions of their child's communication and academic experiences with cochlear implants.
    Nelson LH, Herde L, Munoz K, White KR, Page MD.
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):164-173. PubMed ID: 27780377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.