These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
303 related items for PubMed ID: 28687057
21. A directional remote-microphone for bimodal cochlear implant recipients. Vroegop JL, Homans NC, Goedegebure A, van der Schroeff MP. Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):858-863. PubMed ID: 30261771 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Factors constraining the benefit to speech understanding of combining information from low-frequency hearing and a cochlear implant. Dorman MF, Cook S, Spahr A, Zhang T, Loiselle L, Schramm D, Whittingham J, Gifford R. Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():107-11. PubMed ID: 25285624 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Head shadow enhancement with low-frequency beamforming improves sound localization and speech perception for simulated bimodal listeners. Dieudonné B, Francart T. Hear Res; 2018 Jun; 363():78-84. PubMed ID: 29555110 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Formant frequency discrimination with a fine structure sound coding strategy for cochlear implants. Liepins R, Kaider A, Honeder C, Auinger AB, Dahm V, Riss D, Arnoldner C. Hear Res; 2020 Jul; 392():107970. PubMed ID: 32339775 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Use of technological aids and interpretation services among children and adults with hearing loss. Dammeyer J, Lehane C, Marschark M. Int J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 56(10):740-748. PubMed ID: 28509597 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Bimodal benefits in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users with contralateral residual acoustic hearing. Yang HI, Zeng FG. Int J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 56(sup2):S17-S22. PubMed ID: 28485635 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of insertion depth on spatial speech perception in noise for simulations of cochlear implants and single-sided deafness. Zhou X, Li H, Galvin JJ, Fu QJ, Yuan W. Int J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 56(sup2):S41-S48. PubMed ID: 27367147 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Avoiding disconnection: An evaluation of telephone options for cochlear implant users. Marcrum SC, Picou EM, Steffens T. Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):186-193. PubMed ID: 27809627 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The effect of a coding strategy that removes temporally masked pulses on speech perception by cochlear implant users. Lamping W, Goehring T, Marozeau J, Carlyon RP. Hear Res; 2020 Jun; 391():107969. PubMed ID: 32320925 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Bilateral Versus Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adult Listeners: Speech-On-Speech Masking and Multitalker Localization. Rana B, Buchholz JM, Morgan C, Sharma M, Weller T, Konganda SA, Shirai K, Kawano A. Trends Hear; 2017 Jun; 21():2331216517722106. PubMed ID: 28752811 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Tone perception in Mandarin-speaking children with cochlear implants. Li G, Soli SD, Zheng Y. Int J Audiol; 2017 Jun; 56(sup2):S49-S59. PubMed ID: 28532185 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Speech perception in tones and noise via cochlear implants reveals influence of spectral resolution on temporal processing. Oxenham AJ, Kreft HA. Trends Hear; 2014 Oct 13; 18():. PubMed ID: 25315376 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Cochlear implant simulator with independent representation of the full spiral ganglion. Grange JA, Culling JF, Harris NSL, Bergfeld S. J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Nov 13; 142(5):EL484. PubMed ID: 29195445 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Utility of bilateral acoustic hearing in combination with electrical stimulation provided by the cochlear implant. Plant K, Babic L. Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov 13; 55 Suppl 2():S31-8. PubMed ID: 26987051 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Babbling and consonant production in children with hearing impairment who use hearing aids or cochlear implants - a pilot study. Löfkvist U, Bäckström K, Dahlby-Skoog M, Gunnarsson S, Persson M, Lohmander A. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2020 Dec 13; 45(4):172-180. PubMed ID: 31782330 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]