These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

298 related items for PubMed ID: 28688113

  • 1. Assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism: prospective validation of the simplified Geneva score.
    Robert-Ebadi H, Mostaguir K, Hovens MM, Kare M, Verschuren F, Girard P, Huisman MV, Moustafa F, Kamphuisen PW, Buller HR, Righini M, Le Gal G.
    J Thromb Haemost; 2017 Sep; 15(9):1764-1769. PubMed ID: 28688113
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: the ADJUST-PE study.
    Righini M, Van Es J, Den Exter PL, Roy PM, Verschuren F, Ghuysen A, Rutschmann OT, Sanchez O, Jaffrelot M, Trinh-Duc A, Le Gall C, Moustafa F, Principe A, Van Houten AA, Ten Wolde M, Douma RA, Hazelaar G, Erkens PM, Van Kralingen KW, Grootenboers MJ, Durian MF, Cheung YW, Meyer G, Bounameaux H, Huisman MV, Kamphuisen PW, Le Gal G.
    JAMA; 2014 Mar 19; 311(11):1117-24. PubMed ID: 24643601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The diagnostic value of D-dimer with simplified Geneva score (SGS) pre-test in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE).
    Fu Z, Zhuang X, He Y, Huang H, Guo W.
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jul 20; 15(1):176. PubMed ID: 32690039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The original and simplified Wells rules and age-adjusted D-dimer testing to rule out pulmonary embolism: an individual patient data meta-analysis.
    van Es N, Kraaijpoel N, Klok FA, Huisman MV, Den Exter PL, Mos IC, Galipienzo J, Büller HR, Bossuyt PM.
    J Thromb Haemost; 2017 Apr 20; 15(4):678-684. PubMed ID: 28106338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Sex-specific performance of pre-imaging diagnostic algorithms for pulmonary embolism.
    van Mens TE, van der Pol LM, van Es N, Bistervels IM, Mairuhu ATA, van der Hulle T, Klok FA, Huisman MV, Middeldorp S.
    J Thromb Haemost; 2018 May 20; 16(5):858-865. PubMed ID: 29460484
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Is stand-alone D-dimer testing safe to rule out acute pulmonary embolism?
    van Es N, van der Hulle T, Büller HR, Klok FA, Huisman MV, Galipienzo J, Di Nisio M.
    J Thromb Haemost; 2017 Feb 20; 15(2):323-328. PubMed ID: 27873439
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. VIDAS D-dimer in combination with clinical pre-test probability to rule out pulmonary embolism. A systematic review of management outcome studies.
    Carrier M, Righini M, Djurabi RK, Huisman MV, Perrier A, Wells PS, Rodger M, Wuillemin WA, Le Gal G.
    Thromb Haemost; 2009 May 20; 101(5):886-92. PubMed ID: 19404542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Use of a clinical decision rule in combination with D-dimer concentration in diagnostic workup of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective management study.
    Kruip MJ, Slob MJ, Schijen JH, van der Heul C, Büller HR.
    Arch Intern Med; 2002 Jul 22; 162(14):1631-5. PubMed ID: 12123408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The combination of four different clinical decision rules and an age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off increases the number of patients in whom acute pulmonary embolism can safely be excluded.
    van Es J, Mos I, Douma R, Erkens P, Durian M, Nizet T, van Houten A, Hofstee H, ten Cate H, Ullmann E, Büller H, Huisman M, Kamphuisen PW.
    Thromb Haemost; 2012 Jan 22; 107(1):167-71. PubMed ID: 22072293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Validity and clinical utility of the simplified Wells rule for assessing clinical probability for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism.
    Douma RA, Gibson NS, Gerdes VE, Büller HR, Wells PS, Perrier A, Le Gal G.
    Thromb Haemost; 2009 Jan 22; 101(1):197-200. PubMed ID: 19132208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Derivation and Validation of a 4-Level Clinical Pretest Probability Score for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism to Safely Decrease Imaging Testing.
    Roy PM, Friou E, Germeau B, Douillet D, Kline JA, Righini M, Le Gal G, Moumneh T, Penaloza A.
    JAMA Cardiol; 2021 Jun 01; 6(6):669-677. PubMed ID: 33656522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Age-dependent diagnostic accuracy of clinical scoring systems and D-dimer levels in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA).
    Nagel SN, Steffen IG, Schwartz S, Hamm B, Elgeti T.
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep 01; 29(9):4563-4571. PubMed ID: 30783786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Retrospective validation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria rule in 'PE unlikely' patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
    Crane S, Jaconelli T, Eragat M.
    Eur J Emerg Med; 2018 Jun 01; 25(3):185-190. PubMed ID: 28002070
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.