These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

849 related items for PubMed ID: 28700446

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Psychoacoustic and electrophysiological electric-acoustic interaction effects in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
    Imsiecke M, Büchner A, Lenarz T, Nogueira W.
    Hear Res; 2020 Feb; 386():107873. PubMed ID: 31884220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Simultaneous masking between electric and acoustic stimulation in cochlear implant users with residual low-frequency hearing.
    Krüger B, Büchner A, Nogueira W.
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():185-196. PubMed ID: 28688755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Electric-acoustic forward masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
    Imsiecke M, Krüger B, Büchner A, Lenarz T, Nogueira W.
    Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():25-37. PubMed ID: 29673567
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effectiveness of Phantom Stimulation in Shifting the Pitch Percept in Cochlear Implant Users.
    de Jong MAM, Briaire JJ, Biesheuvel JD, Snel-Bongers J, Böhringer S, Timp GRFM, Frijns JHM.
    Ear Hear; 2020 Jul; 41(5):1258-1269. PubMed ID: 31977727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Forward masking patterns by low and high-rate stimulation in cochlear implant users: Differences in masking effectiveness and spread of neural excitation.
    Zhou N, Dong L, Dixon S.
    Hear Res; 2020 Apr; 389():107921. PubMed ID: 32097828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Psychophysical assessment of spatial spread of excitation in electrical hearing with single and dual electrode contact maskers.
    Dingemanse JG, Frijns JH, Briaire JJ.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):645-57. PubMed ID: 17086076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing.
    Boëx C, Baud L, Cosendai G, Sigrist A, Kós MI, Pelizzone M.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 7(2):110-24. PubMed ID: 16450213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interface: partial tripolar, single-channel thresholds and psychophysical tuning curves.
    Bierer JA, Faulkner KF.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):247-58. PubMed ID: 20090533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation.
    Baumann U, Rader T, Helbig S, Bahmer A.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Apr; 32(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 21869623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Forward masking in different cochlear implant systems.
    Boëx C, Kós MI, Pelizzone M.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2058-65. PubMed ID: 14587605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Contralateral masking in cochlear implant users with residual hearing in the non-implanted ear.
    James C, Blamey P, Shallop JK, Incerti PV, Nicholas AM.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2001 Oct; 6(2):87-97. PubMed ID: 11385182
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Postoperative Electrocochleography from Hybrid Cochlear Implant users: An Alternative Analysis Procedure.
    Kim JS, Tejani VD, Abbas PJ, Brown CJ.
    Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():304-315. PubMed ID: 30393003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Psychophysical measures from electrical stimulation of the human cochlear nucleus.
    Shannon RV, Otto SR.
    Hear Res; 1990 Aug 01; 47(1-2):159-68. PubMed ID: 2228792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
    Xu J, Shepherd RK, Millard RE, Clark GM.
    Hear Res; 1997 Mar 01; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 43.