These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

217 related items for PubMed ID: 28704312

  • 1. Trunk Muscle Activation in the Back and Hack Squat at the Same Relative Loads.
    Clark DR, Lambert MI, Hunter AM.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Jul; 33 Suppl 1():S60-S69. PubMed ID: 28704312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Impact of resistance training status on trunk muscle activation in a fatiguing set of heavy back squats.
    Clark DR, Lambert MI, Grigson C, Hunter AM.
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2021 Feb; 121(2):597-608. PubMed ID: 33206252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Electromyographic and kinetic comparison of the back squat and overhead squat.
    Aspe RR, Swinton PA.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Oct; 28(10):2827-36. PubMed ID: 24662228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Load-Velocity Relationships of the Back vs. Front Squat Exercises in Resistance-Trained Men.
    Spitz RW, Gonzalez AM, Ghigiarelli JJ, Sell KM, Mangine GT.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Feb; 33(2):301-306. PubMed ID: 30688871
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Changing the stability conditions in a back squat: the effect on maximum load lifted and erector spinae muscle activity.
    Fletcher IM, Bagley A.
    Sports Biomech; 2014 Nov; 13(4):380-90. PubMed ID: 25434609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Factors Related to Average Concentric Velocity of Four Barbell Exercises at Various Loads.
    Fahs CA, Blumkaitis JC, Rossow LM.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Mar; 33(3):597-605. PubMed ID: 30640305
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Kinematic Differences Between the Front and Back Squat and Conventional and Sumo Deadlift.
    Kasovic J, Martin B, Fahs CA.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Dec; 33(12):3213-3219. PubMed ID: 31567791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Influence of Loads and Loading Position on the Muscle Activity of the Trunk and Lower Extremity during Squat Exercise.
    Park JH, Lee SJ, Shin HJ, Cho HY.
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Oct 18; 19(20):. PubMed ID: 36294056
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effects of the Safety Squat Bar on Trunk and Lower-Body Mechanics During a Back Squat.
    Hecker KA, Carlson LA, Lawrence MA.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Jul 18; 33 Suppl 1():S45-S51. PubMed ID: 30363042
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A Biomechanical Comparison of the Back Squat and Hexagonal Barbell Deadlift.
    Stahl CA, Regni G, Tanguay J, McElfresh M, Trihy E, Diggin D, King DL.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2024 May 01; 38(5):815-824. PubMed ID: 38662880
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Heel-Raised Foot Posture Does Not Affect Trunk and Lower Extremity Biomechanics During a Barbell Back Squat in Recreational Weight lifters.
    Lee SP, Gillis CB, Ibarra JJ, Oldroyd DF, Zane RS.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Mar 01; 33(3):606-614. PubMed ID: 30789547
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Reliability of Trunk Muscle Electromyography in the Loaded Back Squat Exercise.
    Clark D, Lambert MI, Hunter AM.
    Int J Sports Med; 2016 Jun 01; 37(6):448-56. PubMed ID: 26928915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Trunk muscle activity during different types of low weighted squat exercises in normal and forefoot standing conditions.
    Roth R, Donath L, Faude O, Cresswell AG.
    J Sports Sci; 2020 Dec 01; 38(24):2774-2781. PubMed ID: 32746728
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Maximal Strength, Muscle Activation, and Bar Velocity Comparisons Between Squatting With a Traditional or Safety Squat Bar.
    Vantrease WC, Townsend JR, Sapp PA, Henry RN, Johnson KD.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2021 Feb 01; 35(Suppl 1):S1-S5. PubMed ID: 32032231
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Validation of a Single-Session Protocol to Determine the Load-Velocity Profile and One-Repetition Maximum for the Back Squat Exercise.
    Gomes M, Fitas A, Santos P, Pezarat-Correia P, Mendonca GV.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2024 Jun 01; 38(6):1013-1018. PubMed ID: 38373076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Trunk muscle activation during dynamic weight-training exercises and isometric instability activities.
    Hamlyn N, Behm DG, Young WB.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2007 Nov 01; 21(4):1108-12. PubMed ID: 18076231
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Load-dependent mechanical demands of the lower extremity during the back and front squat.
    Krzyszkowski J, Kipp K.
    J Sports Sci; 2020 Sep 01; 38(17):2005-2012. PubMed ID: 32544021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Compensatory Muscle Activation During Unstable Overhead Squat Using a Water-filled Training Tube.
    Glass SC, Albert RW.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2018 May 01; 32(5):1230-1237. PubMed ID: 28557850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Lower-body work capacity and one-repetition maximum squat prediction in college football players.
    Brechue WF, Mayhew JL.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Feb 01; 26(2):364-72. PubMed ID: 22233793
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. An electromyographical comparison of trunk muscle activity during isometric trunk and dynamic strengthening exercises.
    Comfort P, Pearson SJ, Mather D.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Jan 01; 25(1):149-54. PubMed ID: 21157393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.