These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
385 related items for PubMed ID: 28721528
1. Soft tissue profile changes after Functional Mandibular Advancer or Herbst appliance treatment in class II patients. Hourfar J, Lisson JA, Gross U, Frye L, Kinzinger GSM. Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Mar; 22(2):971-980. PubMed ID: 28721528 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A retrospective cephalometric investigation of two fixed functional orthodontic appliances in class II treatment: Functional Mandibular Advancer vs. Herbst appliance. Kinzinger GSM, Lisson JA, Frye L, Gross U, Hourfar J. Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Jan; 22(1):293-304. PubMed ID: 28365810 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Changes of epiglottis and hyoid bone position after orthodontic treatment with cast splint fixed functional appliances. Hourfar J, Lisson JA, Kinzinger GSM. Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Mar; 25(3):1525-1534. PubMed ID: 33409688 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion in adults: stepwise vs single-step advancement with the Herbst appliance. Purkayastha SK, Rabie AB, Wong R. World J Orthod; 2008 Mar; 9(3):233-43. PubMed ID: 18834006 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation. VanLaecken R, Martin CA, Dischinger T, Razmus T, Ngan P. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty. Baccetti T, Franchi L, Stahl F. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of fixed appliances in correcting Angle Class II on the depth of the posterior airway space: FMA vs. Herbst appliance--a retrospective cephalometric study. Kinzinger G, Czapka K, Ludwig B, Glasl B, Gross U, Lisson J. J Orofac Orthop; 2011 Aug; 72(4):301-20. PubMed ID: 21898196 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Upper airway changes following single-step or stepwise advancement using the Functional Mandibular Advancer. Aras I, Pasaoglu A, Olmez S, Unal I, Aras A. J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Nov; 77(6):454-462. PubMed ID: 27770150 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances. Tomblyn T, Rogers M, Andrews L, Martin C, Tremont T, Gunel E, Ngan P. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes. Wigal TG, Dischinger T, Martin C, Razmus T, Gunel E, Ngan P. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Changes in soft tissue profile following the treatment using a Herbst appliance--a photographic analysis. Nedeljković N, Cubrilo D, Hadzi-Mihailović M. Vojnosanit Pregl; 2014 Jan; 71(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 24516984 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness of incremental vs maximum bite advancement during Herbst appliance therapy in late adolescent and young adult patients. Amuk NG, Baysal A, Coskun R, Kurt G. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jan; 155(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 30591165 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment effects of skeletally anchored Forsus FRD EZ and Herbst appliances: A retrospective clinical study. Celikoglu M, Buyuk SK, Ekizer A, Unal T. Angle Orthod; 2016 Mar; 86(2):306-14. PubMed ID: 26258899 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]