These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

411 related items for PubMed ID: 28721994

  • 1. Evaluation of marginal and internal gaps of metal ceramic crowns obtained from conventional impressions and casting techniques with those obtained from digital techniques.
    Rai R, Kumar SA, Prabhu R, Govindan RT, Tanveer FM.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(3):291-297. PubMed ID: 28721994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Clinical marginal and internal adaptation of CAD/CAM milling, laser sintering, and cast metal ceramic crowns.
    Tamac E, Toksavul S, Toman M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):909-13. PubMed ID: 24819532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E, Aquilino SA, Gratton DG, Holloway JA, Denry I, Thomas GW, Qian F.
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Marginal and internal fit of pressed ceramic crowns made from conventional and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing wax patterns: An in vitro comparison.
    Shamseddine L, Mortada R, Rifai K, Chidiac JJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 26948080
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Internal fit of single crowns produced by CAD-CAM and lost-wax metal casting technique assessed by the triple-scan protocol.
    Dahl BE, Rønold HJ, Dahl JE.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):400-404. PubMed ID: 27692584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Clinical marginal and internal fit of metal ceramic crowns fabricated with a selective laser melting technology.
    Huang Z, Zhang L, Zhu J, Zhang X.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):623-7. PubMed ID: 25794918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluation of marginal/internal fit of chrome-cobalt crowns: Direct laser metal sintering versus computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing.
    Gunsoy S, Ulusoy M.
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2016 Jun; 19(5):636-44. PubMed ID: 27538553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of the Fit of Lithium Disilicate Crowns made from Conventional, Digital, or Conventional/Digital Techniques.
    Al Hamad KQ, Al Rashdan BA, Al Omari WM, Baba NZ.
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e580-e586. PubMed ID: 30091168
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of the Marginal Fit of Cobalt-Chromium Metal-Ceramic Crowns Fabricated by CAD/CAM Techniques and Conventional Methods at Three Production Stages.
    Real-Voltas F, Romano-Cardozo E, Figueras-Alvarez O, Brufau-de Barbera M, Cabratosa-Termes J.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2017 Feb; 30(3):304–305. PubMed ID: 28319213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
    Ahrberg D, Lauer HC, Ahrberg M, Weigl P.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 26070435
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Fit of pressed crowns fabricated from two CAD-CAM wax pattern process plans: A comparative in vitro study.
    Shamseddine L, Mortada R, Rifai K, Chidiac JJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 28024815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Selective laser sintering versus conventional lost-wax casting for single metal copings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yang J, Li H, Xu L, Wang Y.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):897-904. PubMed ID: 33789799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effect of electric arc, gas oxygen torch and induction melting techniques on the marginal accuracy of cast base-metal and noble metal-ceramic crowns.
    Gómez-Cogolludo P, Castillo-Oyagüe R, Lynch CD, Suárez-García MJ.
    J Dent; 2013 Sep; 41(9):826-31. PubMed ID: 23810734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of the fit of zirconia copings fabricated by direct and indirect digital scanning procedures.
    Lee B, Oh KC, Haam D, Lee JH, Moon HS.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 29428522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Influence of manufacturing technique on marginal fit of cobalt chromium restorations: An in-vitro Study.
    Sarda AS, Bedia SV.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2021 Aug; 32(4):495-499. PubMed ID: 35645078
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effect of production method on surface roughness, marginal and internal fit, and retention of cobalt-chromium single crowns.
    Lövgren N, Roxner R, Klemendz S, Larsson C.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 28024818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Accuracy of ringless casting and accelerated wax-elimination technique: a comparative in vitro study.
    Prasad R, Al-Keraif AA, Kathuria N, Gandhi PV, Bhide SV.
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Feb; 23(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 23889829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Marginal and internal fit of metal copings fabricated with rapid prototyping and conventional waxing.
    Farjood E, Vojdani M, Torabi K, Khaledi AA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jan; 117(1):164-170. PubMed ID: 27460320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.