These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

286 related items for PubMed ID: 28738248

  • 1. The reliability and validity of measurements of human dental casts made by an intra-oral 3D scanner, with conventional hand-held digital callipers as the comparison measure.
    Rajshekar M, Julian R, Williams AM, Tennant M, Forrest A, Walsh LJ, Wilson G, Blizzard L.
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():198-204. PubMed ID: 28738248
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Can the intra-examiner variability of Little's Irregularity Index be improved using 3D digital models of study casts?
    Dowling AH, Burns A, Macauley D, Garvey TM, Fleming GJ.
    J Dent; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1271-80. PubMed ID: 24012518
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Reliability, reproducibility and validity of the conventional buccolingual and mesiodistal measurements on 3D dental digital models obtained from intra-oral 3D scanner.
    Soto-Álvarez C, Fonseca GM, Viciano J, Alemán I, Rojas-Torres J, Zúñiga MH, López-Lázaro S.
    Arch Oral Biol; 2020 Jan; 109():104575. PubMed ID: 31589998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The accuracy of a 3-D laser scanner for crown width measurements.
    Nouri M, Massudi R, Bagheban AA, Azimi S, Fereidooni F.
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 19634463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A clinical photogrammetric method to measure dental arch dimensions and mesio-distal tooth size.
    Normando D, da Silva PL, Mendes ÁM.
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):721-6. PubMed ID: 21282283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions.
    Wiranto MG, Engelbrecht WP, Tutein Nolthenius HE, van der Meer WJ, Ren Y.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jan; 143(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 23273370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The reliability of Little's Irregularity Index for the upper dental arch using three dimensional (3D) digital models.
    Burns A, Dowling AH, Garvey TM, Fleming GJ.
    J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1320-6. PubMed ID: 25064042
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
    Leifert MF, Leifert MM, Efstratiadis SS, Cangialosi TJ.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner: a comparison of tooth widths and Bolton ratios.
    Naidu D, Freer TJ.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):304-10. PubMed ID: 23910212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.