These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

914 related items for PubMed ID: 28738747

  • 1. How directional microphones affect speech recognition, listening effort and localisation for listeners with moderate-to-severe hearing loss.
    Picou EM, Ricketts TA.
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):909-918. PubMed ID: 28738747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
    Ricketts TA, Picou EM.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Speech recognition in noise using bilateral open-fit hearing aids: the limited benefit of directional microphones and noise reduction.
    Magnusson L, Claesson A, Persson M, Tengstrand T.
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 22928919
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
    Ohlenforst B, Wendt D, Kramer SE, Naylor G, Zekveld AA, Lunner T.
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
    Wu YH, Stangl E, Bentler RA, Stanziola RW.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Symmetrical and asymmetrical directional benefits are present for talkers at the front and side.
    Ricketts TA, Picou EM.
    Int J Audiol; 2022 Mar; 61(3):177-186. PubMed ID: 34106803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
    Picou EM, Aspell E, Ricketts TA.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Mar; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. An evaluation of the performance of two binaural beamformers in complex and dynamic multitalker environments.
    Best V, Mejia J, Freeston K, van Hoesel RJ, Dillon H.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Mar; 54(10):727-35. PubMed ID: 26140298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Acoustic and perceptual effects of magnifying interaural difference cues in a simulated "binaural" hearing aid.
    de Taillez T, Grimm G, Kollmeier B, Neher T.
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S81-S91. PubMed ID: 28395561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Application of frequency importance functions to directivity for prediction of benefit in uniform fields.
    Ricketts TA, Henry PP, Hornsby BW.
    Ear Hear; 2005 Oct; 26(5):473-86. PubMed ID: 16230897
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Examination of a hybrid beamformer that preserves auditory spatial cues.
    Best V, Roverud E, Mason CR, Kidd G.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):EL369. PubMed ID: 29092558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Assessment of hearing aid algorithms using a master hearing aid: the influence of hearing aid experience on the relationship between speech recognition and cognitive capacity.
    Rählmann S, Meis M, Schulte M, Kießling J, Walger M, Meister H.
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S105-S111. PubMed ID: 28449597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effect of Hearing Aid Directionality and Remote Microphone on Speech Intelligibility in Complex Listening Situations.
    Wagener KC, Vormann M, Latzel M, Mülder HE.
    Trends Hear; 2018 Jun; 22():2331216518804945. PubMed ID: 30322342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of a BICROS System with a Directional Microphone in the Receiver and Transmitter.
    Valente M, Oeding K.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(10):856-71. PubMed ID: 26554490
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Hearing-aid users' voices: a factor that could affect directional benefit.
    Wu YH, Stangl E, Bentler RA.
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Nov; 52(11):789-94. PubMed ID: 23777478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The Effects of Hearing Aid Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction Processing on Listening Effort in Older Adults with Hearing Loss.
    Desjardins JL.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jan; 27(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 26809324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The performance of an automatic acoustic-based program classifier compared to hearing aid users' manual selection of listening programs.
    Searchfield GD, Linford T, Kobayashi K, Crowhen D, Latzel M.
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):201-212. PubMed ID: 29069954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
    Hornsby BW.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Efficacy of a reverse cardioid directional microphone.
    Kuk F, Keenan D.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Jan; 23(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 22284842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
    Hornsby BW, Ricketts TA.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 46.