These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
286 related items for PubMed ID: 28745075
1. Outcomes of Lisfranc Injuries in an Active Duty Military Population. Hawkinson MP, Tennent DJ, Belisle J, Osborn P. Foot Ankle Int; 2017 Oct; 38(10):1115-1119. PubMed ID: 28745075 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Clinical and radiographic evaluation of open reduction and internal fixation with headless compression screws in treatment of lisfranc joint injuries]. Zhang H, Min L, Wang G, Liu L, Fang Y, Tu C. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Oct; 27(10):1196-201. PubMed ID: 24397130 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Open Reduction And Internal Fixation of Tarsometatarsal (Lisfranc) Fracture Dislocations-Is Arthrodesis Necessary? Joseph NM, Patel R, Freedman C, Cox K, Mir HR. J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2024 Feb 15; 32(4):178-185. PubMed ID: 37988566 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Military personnel sustaining Lisfranc injuries have high rates of disability separation. Balazs GC, Hanley MG, Pavey GJ, Rue JP. J R Army Med Corps; 2017 Jun 15; 163(3):215-219. PubMed ID: 27940985 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Primary Arthrodesis versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Low-Energy Lisfranc Injuries in a Young Athletic Population. Cochran G, Renninger C, Tompane T, Bellamy J, Kuhn K. Foot Ankle Int; 2017 Sep 15; 38(9):957-963. PubMed ID: 28602113 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Primary Arthrodesis for the Treatment of Acute Lisfranc Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Magill HHP, Hajibandeh S, Bennett J, Campbell N, Mehta J. J Foot Ankle Surg; 2019 Mar 15; 58(2):328-332. PubMed ID: 30850102 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost comparison and complication rate of Lisfranc injuries treated with open reduction internal fixation versus primary arthrodesis. Barnds B, Tucker W, Morris B, Tarakemeh A, Schroeppel JP, Mullen S, Vopat BG. Injury; 2018 Dec 15; 49(12):2318-2321. PubMed ID: 30314633 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reoperation Rate Differences Between Open Reduction Internal Fixation and Primary Arthrodesis of Lisfranc Injuries. Buda M, Kink S, Stavenuiter R, Hagemeijer CN, Chien B, Hosseini A, Johnson AH, Guss D, DiGiovanni CW. Foot Ankle Int; 2018 Sep 15; 39(9):1089-1096. PubMed ID: 29812959 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Plates, Screws, or Combination? Radiologic Outcomes After Lisfranc Fracture Dislocation. Lau S, Howells N, Millar M, De Villiers D, Joseph S, Oppy A. J Foot Ankle Surg; 2016 Sep 15; 55(4):799-802. PubMed ID: 27079306 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Primary Arthrodesis Versus Open Reduction Internal Fixation for Primarily Ligamentous Lisfranc Injuries. Albright RH, Haller S, Klein E, Baker JR, Weil L, Weil LS, Fleischer AE. J Foot Ankle Surg; 2018 Sep 15; 57(2):325-331. PubMed ID: 29275036 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Is Routine Hardware Removal Following Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Tarsometatarsal Joint Fracture/Dislocation Necessary? VanPelt MD, Athey A, Yao J, Ennin K, Kassem L, Mulligan E, Lalli T, Liu GT. J Foot Ankle Surg; 2019 Mar 15; 58(2):226-230. PubMed ID: 30850094 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the treatment of acute lisfranc injuries: Open reduction and internal fixation versus primary arthrodesis. Alcelik I, Fenton C, Hannant G, Abdelrahim M, Jowett C, Budgen A, Stanley J. Foot Ankle Surg; 2020 Apr 15; 26(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 31103276 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcome after open reduction and internal fixation of Lisfranc joint injuries. Kuo RS, Tejwani NC, Digiovanni CW, Holt SK, Benirschke SK, Hansen ST, Sangeorzan BJ. J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Nov 15; 82(11):1609-18. PubMed ID: 11097452 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]