These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

337 related items for PubMed ID: 28750776

  • 1. In vitro biofilm formation on resin-based composites after different finishing and polishing procedures.
    Cazzaniga G, Ottobelli M, Ionescu AC, Paolone G, Gherlone E, Ferracane JL, Brambilla E.
    J Dent; 2017 Dec; 67():43-52. PubMed ID: 28750776
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Streptococcus mutans biofilm adhesion on composite resin surfaces after different finishing and polishing techniques.
    Pereira CA, Eskelson E, Cavalli V, Liporoni PC, Jorge AO, do Rego MA.
    Oper Dent; 2011 Dec; 36(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 21740238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. In vitro biofilm formation on resin-based composites cured under different surface conditions.
    Ionescu AC, Cazzaniga G, Ottobelli M, Ferracane JL, Paolone G, Brambilla E.
    J Dent; 2018 Oct; 77():78-86. PubMed ID: 30030124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness, gloss and color of resin-based composites.
    Paravina RD, Roeder L, Lu H, Vogel K, Powers JM.
    Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):262-6. PubMed ID: 15478488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Techniques on the Surface Roughness and the Color of Nanocomposite Resin Restorative Materials.
    Avsar A, Yuzbasioglu E, Sarac D.
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2015 Aug; 24(5):881-90. PubMed ID: 26768641
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Conventional polishing techniques versus a nanofilled surface sealer: preliminary findings regarding surface roughness changes and analysis.
    Jefferies SR, Boston DW.
    J Clin Dent; 2010 Aug; 21(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 20527508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A randomised controlled study on the use of finishing and polishing systems on different resin composites using 3D contact optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy.
    Daud A, Gray G, Lynch CD, Wilson NHF, Blum IR.
    J Dent; 2018 Apr; 71():25-30. PubMed ID: 29360492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation and release of fluoride from experimental resin-based composites depending on surface treatment and S-PRG filler particle fraction.
    Hahnel S, Wastl DS, Schneider-Feyrer S, Giessibl FJ, Brambilla E, Cazzaniga G, Ionescu A.
    J Adhes Dent; 2014 Aug; 16(4):313-21. PubMed ID: 24669368
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites.
    Gönülol N, Yilmaz F.
    J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40 Suppl 2():e64-70. PubMed ID: 22819955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Biofilm formation affects surface properties of novel bioactive glass-containing composites.
    Hyun HK, Salehi S, Ferracane JL.
    Dent Mater; 2015 Dec; 31(12):1599-608. PubMed ID: 26590029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials.
    Türkün LS, Türkün M.
    Oper Dent; 2004 Dec; 29(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 15088733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of two-step versus four-step composite finishing/polishing disc systems: evaluation of a new two-step composite polishing disc system.
    da Costa JB, Goncalves F, Ferracane JL.
    Oper Dent; 2011 Dec; 36(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 21702670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness of tooth-colored materials.
    Celik C, Ozgünaltay G.
    Quintessence Int; 2009 Oct; 40(9):783-9. PubMed ID: 19862405
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Influence of surface properties of resin-based composites on in vitro Streptococcus mutans biofilm development.
    Ionescu A, Wutscher E, Brambilla E, Schneider-Feyrer S, Giessibl FJ, Hahnel S.
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2012 Oct; 120(5):458-65. PubMed ID: 22985005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Relationships between composite roughness and Streptococcus mutans biofilm depth under shear in vitro.
    O'Brien EP, Mondal K, Chen CC, Hanley L, Drummond JL, Rockne KJ.
    J Dent; 2023 Jul; 134():104535. PubMed ID: 37156358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials.
    Attar N.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan 01; 8(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17211502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effect of different finishing techniques for restorative materials on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion.
    Aykent F, Yondem I, Ozyesil AG, Gunal SK, Avunduk MC, Ozkan S.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Apr 01; 103(4):221-7. PubMed ID: 20362765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Surface roughness of enamel and four resin composites.
    Botta AC, Duarte S, Paulin Filho PI, Gheno SM, Powers JM.
    Am J Dent; 2009 Oct 01; 22(5):252-4. PubMed ID: 20225464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of different polishing techniques for composite resin materials on surface properties and bacterial biofilm formation.
    Kurt A, Cilingir A, Bilmenoglu C, Topcuoglu N, Kulekci G.
    J Dent; 2019 Nov 01; 90():103199. PubMed ID: 31557551
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effect of polishing systems on stain susceptibility and surface roughness of nanocomposite resin material.
    Barakah HM, Taher NM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep 01; 112(3):625-31. PubMed ID: 24721503
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.