These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

576 related items for PubMed ID: 28752807

  • 1. Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG.
    Miles K, McMahon C, Boisvert I, Ibrahim R, de Lissa P, Graham P, Lyxell B.
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517706396. PubMed ID: 28752807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Festen JM.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The effect of reward on listening effort as reflected by the pupil dilation response.
    Koelewijn T, Zekveld AA, Lunner T, Kramer SE.
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():106-112. PubMed ID: 30096490
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effects of attention on the speech reception threshold and pupil response of people with impaired and normal hearing.
    Koelewijn T, Versfeld NJ, Kramer SE.
    Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():56-63. PubMed ID: 28869841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
    Ohlenforst B, Wendt D, Kramer SE, Naylor G, Zekveld AA, Lunner T.
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Festen JM.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Aug; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The pupil response reveals increased listening effort when it is difficult to focus attention.
    Koelewijn T, de Kluiver H, Shinn-Cunningham BG, Zekveld AA, Kramer SE.
    Hear Res; 2015 May; 323():81-90. PubMed ID: 25732724
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Pupil Responses of Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury During Processing of Speech in Noise.
    Koelewijn T, van Haastrecht JAP, Kramer SE.
    Trends Hear; 2018 May; 22():2331216518811444. PubMed ID: 30482105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
    Koelewijn T, Zekveld AA, Festen JM, Kramer SE.
    Ear Hear; 2012 May; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Impact of stimulus-related factors and hearing impairment on listening effort as indicated by pupil dilation.
    Ohlenforst B, Zekveld AA, Lunner T, Wendt D, Naylor G, Wang Y, Versfeld NJ, Kramer SE.
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():68-79. PubMed ID: 28622894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effects of hearing acuity on psychophysiological responses to effortful speech perception.
    Keur-Huizinga L, Huizinga NA, Zekveld AA, Versfeld NJ, van de Ven SRB, van Dijk WAJ, de Geus EJC, Kramer SE.
    Hear Res; 2024 Jul; 448():109031. PubMed ID: 38761554
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of masker type and signal-to-noise ratio on the pupillary response while performing a speech-in-noise test.
    Wendt D, Koelewijn T, Książek P, Kramer SE, Lunner T.
    Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 369():67-78. PubMed ID: 29858121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The influence of informational masking on speech perception and pupil response in adults with hearing impairment.
    Koelewijn T, Zekveld AA, Festen JM, Kramer SE.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1596-606. PubMed ID: 24606294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Please try harder! The influence of hearing status and evaluative feedback during listening on the pupil dilation response, saliva-cortisol and saliva alpha-amylase levels.
    Zekveld AA, van Scheepen JAM, Versfeld NJ, Veerman ECI, Kramer SE.
    Hear Res; 2019 Sep 15; 381():107768. PubMed ID: 31387070
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.
    Desjardins JL, Doherty KA.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep 15; 34(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 23095723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Monitoring Alpha Oscillations and Pupil Dilation across a Performance-Intensity Function.
    McMahon CM, Boisvert I, de Lissa P, Granger L, Ibrahim R, Lo CY, Miles K, Graham PL.
    Front Psychol; 2016 Sep 15; 7():745. PubMed ID: 27252671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The Influence of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Response Times to Speech, and Perceived Listening Effort in Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    van den Tillaart-Haverkate M, de Ronde-Brons I, Dreschler WA, Houben R.
    Trends Hear; 2017 Sep 15; 21():2331216517716844. PubMed ID: 28656807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. EEG activity as an objective measure of cognitive load during effortful listening: A study on pediatric subjects with bilateral, asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss.
    Marsella P, Scorpecci A, Cartocci G, Giannantonio S, Maglione AG, Venuti I, Brizi A, Babiloni F.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Aug 15; 99():1-7. PubMed ID: 28688548
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing audiovisual speech in noise.
    Gosselin PA, Gagné JP.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov 15; 50(11):786-92. PubMed ID: 21916790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. An exploratory Study of EEG Alpha Oscillation and Pupil Dilation in Hearing-Aid Users During Effortful listening to Continuous Speech.
    Seifi Ala T, Graversen C, Wendt D, Alickovic E, Whitmer WM, Lunner T.
    PLoS One; 2020 Nov 15; 15(7):e0235782. PubMed ID: 32649733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 29.