These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
576 related items for PubMed ID: 28752807
21. Relations Between Self-Reported Daily-Life Fatigue, Hearing Status, and Pupil Dilation During a Speech Perception in Noise Task. Wang Y, Naylor G, Kramer SE, Zekveld AA, Wendt D, Ohlenforst B, Lunner T. Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):573-582. PubMed ID: 29117062 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Brain activity underlying the recovery of meaning from degraded speech: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study. Wijayasiri P, Hartley DEH, Wiggins IM. Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():55-67. PubMed ID: 28571617 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The effect of monetary reward on listening effort and sentence recognition. Koelewijn T, Zekveld AA, Lunner T, Kramer SE. Hear Res; 2021 Jul; 406():108255. PubMed ID: 33964552 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Hearing Aid Noise Reduction Lowers the Sustained Listening Effort During Continuous Speech in Noise-A Combined Pupillometry and EEG Study. Fiedler L, Seifi Ala T, Graversen C, Alickovic E, Lunner T, Wendt D. Ear Hear; 2021 Jul; 42(6):1590-1601. PubMed ID: 33950865 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Listening Effort in Cochlear Implant Users: The Effect of Speech Intelligibility, Noise Reduction Processing, and Working Memory Capacity on the Pupil Dilation Response. Dingemanse G, Goedegebure A. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Jan 12; 65(1):392-404. PubMed ID: 34898265 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Informational masking with speech-on-speech intelligibility: Pupil response and time-course of learning. Versfeld NJ, Lie S, Kramer SE, Zekveld AA. J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Apr 12; 149(4):2353. PubMed ID: 33940918 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment. Wardenga N, Batsoulis C, Wagener KC, Brand T, Lenarz T, Maier H. Int J Audiol; 2015 Apr 12; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Copresence Was Found to Be Related to Some Pupil Measures in Persons With Hearing Loss While They Performed a Speech-in-Noise Task. Pielage H, Plain BJ, Saunders GH, Versfeld NJ, Lunner T, Kramer SE, Zekveld AA. Ear Hear; 2015 Apr 12; 44(5):1190-1201. PubMed ID: 37012623 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Neural indices of phonemic discrimination and sentence-level speech intelligibility in quiet and noise: A P3 study. Koerner TK, Zhang Y, Nelson PB, Wang B, Zou H. Hear Res; 2017 Jul 12; 350():58-67. PubMed ID: 28441570 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Automated Measurement of Speech Recognition, Reaction Time, and Speech Rate and Their Relation to Self-Reported Listening Effort for Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners Using various Maskers. Holube I, Taesler S, Ibelings S, Hansen M, Ooster J. Trends Hear; 2024 Jul 12; 28():23312165241276435. PubMed ID: 39311635 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The Impact of Auditory Spectral Resolution on Listening Effort Revealed by Pupil Dilation. Winn MB, Edwards JR, Litovsky RY. Ear Hear; 2015 Jul 12; 36(4):e153-65. PubMed ID: 25654299 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Masked speech perception across the adult lifespan: Impact of age and hearing impairment. Goossens T, Vercammen C, Wouters J, van Wieringen A. Hear Res; 2017 Feb 12; 344():109-124. PubMed ID: 27845259 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Disentangling listening effort and memory load beyond behavioural evidence: Pupillary response to listening effort during a concurrent memory task. Zhang Y, Lehmann A, Deroche M. PLoS One; 2021 Feb 12; 16(3):e0233251. PubMed ID: 33657100 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The eye as a window to the listening brain: neural correlates of pupil size as a measure of cognitive listening load. Zekveld AA, Heslenfeld DJ, Johnsrude IS, Versfeld NJ, Kramer SE. Neuroimage; 2014 Nov 01; 101():76-86. PubMed ID: 24999040 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation? Hochmuth S, Jürgens T, Brand T, Kollmeier B. Int J Audiol; 2015 Nov 01; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests. Hochmuth S, Kollmeier B, Brand T, Jürgens T. Int J Audiol; 2015 Sep 01; 54 Suppl 2():62-70. PubMed ID: 26097982 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Cognitive processing load across a wide range of listening conditions: insights from pupillometry. Zekveld AA, Kramer SE. Psychophysiology; 2014 Mar 01; 51(3):277-84. PubMed ID: 24506437 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]