These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

156 related items for PubMed ID: 28764441

  • 1. Effects of reverberation, background talker number, and compression release time on signal-to-noise ratio.
    Reinhart P, Zahorik P, Souza PE.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jul; 142(1):EL130. PubMed ID: 28764441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
    Ohlenforst B, Wendt D, Kramer SE, Naylor G, Zekveld AA, Lunner T.
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effects of hearing-aid dynamic range compression on spatial perception in a reverberant environment.
    Hassager HG, Wiinberg A, Dau T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2556. PubMed ID: 28464692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Acoustic and perceptual effects of magnifying interaural difference cues in a simulated "binaural" hearing aid.
    de Taillez T, Grimm G, Kollmeier B, Neher T.
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S81-S91. PubMed ID: 28395561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. On a reference-free speech quality estimator for hearing aids.
    Suelzle D, Parsa V, Falk TH.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL412-8. PubMed ID: 23656102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of combined dynamic compression and single channel noise reduction for hearing aid applications.
    Kortlang S, Chen Z, Gerkmann T, Kollmeier B, Hohmann V, Ewert SD.
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S43-S54. PubMed ID: 28355947
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Simultaneous suppression of noise and reverberation in cochlear implants using a ratio masking strategy.
    Hazrati O, Sadjadi SO, Loizou PC, Hansen JH.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):3759-65. PubMed ID: 24180786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The Effects of Signal to Noise Ratio, T60 , Wide-Dynamic Range Compression Speed, and Digital Noise Reduction in a Virtual Restaurant Setting.
    Ellis GM, Crukley J, Souza PE.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Nov; 45(3):760-774. PubMed ID: 38254265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The Noise Reduction Algorithm May Not Compensate for the Degradation in Output Signal-to-Noise Ratio Caused by Wide Dynamic Range Compression.
    Yun D, Lentz J, Shen Y.
    Am J Audiol; 2024 Sep 03; 33(3):793-809. PubMed ID: 38875482
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
    Neher T, Wagener KC, Latzel M.
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep 03; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The Just-Meaningful Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio.
    McShefferty D, Whitmer WM, Akeroyd MA.
    Trends Hear; 2016 Feb 01; 20():. PubMed ID: 26834121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Binaural model-based dynamic-range compression.
    Ernst SMA, Kortlang S, Grimm G, Bisitz T, Kollmeier B, Ewert SD.
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun 01; 57(sup3):S31-S42. PubMed ID: 29373937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Nonlinear frequency compression: effects on sound quality ratings of speech and music.
    Parsa V, Scollie S, Glista D, Seelisch A.
    Trends Amplif; 2013 Mar 01; 17(1):54-68. PubMed ID: 23539261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. An algorithm to increase intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in the presence of a competing talker.
    Healy EW, Delfarah M, Vasko JL, Carter BL, Wang D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun 01; 141(6):4230. PubMed ID: 28618817
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The combined effects of reverberation and noise on speech intelligibility by cochlear implant listeners.
    Hazrati O, Loizou PC.
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jun 01; 51(6):437-43. PubMed ID: 22356300
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effects of Directionality, Compression, and Working Memory on Speech Recognition.
    Rallapalli V, Ellis G, Souza P.
    Ear Hear; 2021 Jun 01; 42(3):492-505. PubMed ID: 33136708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The ANL: does it, or does it not?
    Roeser RJ.
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan 01; 53(1):1. PubMed ID: 24219090
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Examination of a hybrid beamformer that preserves auditory spatial cues.
    Best V, Roverud E, Mason CR, Kidd G.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct 01; 142(4):EL369. PubMed ID: 29092558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effects of WDRC release time and number of channels on output SNR and speech recognition.
    Alexander JM, Masterson K.
    Ear Hear; 2015 Oct 01; 36(2):e35-49. PubMed ID: 25470368
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.