These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
335 related items for PubMed ID: 28780384
1. Influences of microgap and micromotion of implant-abutment interface on marginal bone loss around implant neck. Liu Y, Wang J. Arch Oral Biol; 2017 Nov; 83():153-160. PubMed ID: 28780384 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone levels in non-submerged dental implants: a radiographic study in the canine mandible. King GN, Hermann JS, Schoolfield JD, Buser D, Cochran DL. J Periodontol; 2002 Oct; 73(10):1111-7. PubMed ID: 12416767 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of implant-abutment connection to peri-implant bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Caricasulo R, Malchiodi L, Ghensi P, Fantozzi G, Cucchi A. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Aug; 20(4):653-664. PubMed ID: 29761902 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. AICRG, Part II: Crestal bone loss associated with the Ankylos implant: loading to 36 months. Chou CT, Morris HF, Ochi S, Walker L, DesRosiers D. J Oral Implantol; 2004 Aug; 30(3):134-43. PubMed ID: 15255390 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of microgap location and configuration on radiographic bone loss in nonsubmerged implants: an experimental study in dogs. Weng D, Nagata MJ, Leite CM, de Melo LG, Bosco AF. Int J Prosthodont; 2011 Aug; 24(5):445-52. PubMed ID: 21909485 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible. Hermann JS, Schoolfield JD, Schenk RK, Buser D, Cochran DL. J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1372-83. PubMed ID: 11699479 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Microgap and Micromotion at the Implant Abutment Interface Cause Marginal Bone Loss Around Dental Implant but More Evidence is Needed. Alqutaibi AY, Aboalrejal AN. J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2018 Jun; 18(2):171-172. PubMed ID: 29747801 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. Hermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, Cochran DL. J Periodontol; 2000 Sep; 71(9):1412-24. PubMed ID: 11022770 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone response to loaded implants with non-matching implant-abutment diameters in the canine mandible. Cochran DL, Bosshardt DD, Grize L, Higginbottom FL, Jones AA, Jung RE, Wieland M, Dard M. J Periodontol; 2009 Apr; 80(4):609-17. PubMed ID: 19335081 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Implant-Abutment Connections: A Review of Biologic Consequences and Peri-implantitis Implications. Sasada Y, Cochran DL. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017 Apr; 32(6):1296-1307. PubMed ID: 29140374 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around internal-hex implants with switched platform: a clinical case report series. de Almeida FD, Carvalho AC, Fontes M, Pedrosa A, Costa R, Noleto JW, Mourão CF. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011 Apr; 26(3):587-92. PubMed ID: 21691606 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiple single-tooth implant restorations in the posterior jaws: maintenance of marginal bone levels with reference to the implant-abutment microgap. Norton MR. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006 Apr; 21(5):777-84. PubMed ID: 17066640 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Persistent acute inflammation at the implant-abutment interface. Broggini N, McManus LM, Hermann JS, Medina RU, Oates TW, Schenk RK, Buser D, Mellonig JT, Cochran DL. J Dent Res; 2003 Mar; 82(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 12598555 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the sealing capability of implants to titanium and zirconia abutments against Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, and Fusobacterium nucleatum under different screw torque values. Smith NA, Turkyilmaz I. J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):561-7. PubMed ID: 24656409 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of implant-abutment connection and positioning of the machined collar/microgap on crestal bone level changes: a systematic review. Schwarz F, Hegewald A, Becker J. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):417-25. PubMed ID: 23782338 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Platform switching minimises crestal bone loss around dental implants: truth or myth? Romanos GE, Javed F. J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Sep; 41(9):700-8. PubMed ID: 24860981 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Micromovement Evaluation of Original and Compatible Abutments at the Implant-abutment Interface. Berberi A, Maroun D, Kanj W, Amine EZ, Philippe A. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Nov 01; 17(11):907-913. PubMed ID: 27965499 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of microgap location and configuration on radiographic bone loss around submerged implants: an experimental study in dogs. Weng D, Nagata MJ, Bosco AF, de Melo LG. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011 Nov 01; 26(5):941-6. PubMed ID: 22010074 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of microgap location and configuration on peri-implant bone morphology in nonsubmerged implants: an experimental study in dogs. Weng D, Nagata MJ, Bell M, de Melo LG, Bosco AF. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010 Nov 01; 25(3):540-7. PubMed ID: 20556253 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Experimental research on the relationship between fit accuracy and fracture resistance of zirconia abutments. Sui X, Wei H, Wang D, Han Y, Deng J, Wang Y, Wang J, Yang J. J Dent; 2014 Oct 01; 42(10):1353-9. PubMed ID: 24561040 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]