These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

489 related items for PubMed ID: 28793847

  • 1. Effects of electrode deactivation on speech recognition in multichannel cochlear implant recipients.
    Schvartz-Leyzac KC, Zwolan TA, Pfingst BE.
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Nov; 18(6):324-334. PubMed ID: 28793847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
    Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Baskent D, Wang X.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Cochlear Implantation in Adults With Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Speech Recognition in Quiet and in Noise, and Health Related Quality of Life.
    Sladen DP, Carlson ML, Dowling BP, Olund AP, DeJong MD, Breneman A, Hollander S, Beatty CW, Neff BA, Driscoll CL.
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Jun; 39(5):576-581. PubMed ID: 29683995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems.
    Firszt JB, Holden LK, Skinner MW, Tobey EA, Peterson A, Gaggl W, Runge-Samuelson CL, Wackym PA.
    Ear Hear; 2004 Aug; 25(4):375-87. PubMed ID: 15292777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception.
    Nie K, Barco A, Zeng FG.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 16518146
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Speech Recognition as a Function of Age and Listening Experience in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    Murr AT, Canfarotta MW, O'Connell BP, Buss E, King ER, Bucker AL, Dillon SA, Rooth MA, Dedmon MM, Brown KD, Dillon MT.
    Laryngoscope; 2021 Sep; 131(9):2106-2111. PubMed ID: 34043247
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Amplitude mapping and phoneme recognition in cochlear implant listeners.
    Zeng FG, Galvin JJ.
    Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 10037066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing.
    Fu QJ, Shannon RV, Wang X.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Dec; 104(6):3586-96. PubMed ID: 9857517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Results using the OPAL strategy in Mandarin speaking cochlear implant recipients.
    Vandali AE, Dawson PW, Arora K.
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(sup2):S74-S85. PubMed ID: 27329178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Individual Differences in Speech Recognition Changes After Cochlear Implantation.
    Dornhoffer JR, Reddy P, Meyer TA, Schvartz-Leyzac KC, Dubno JR, McRackan TR.
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2021 Mar 01; 147(3):280-286. PubMed ID: 33410869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users.
    Hersbach AA, Arora K, Mauger SJ, Dawson PW.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Mar 01; 33(4):e13-23. PubMed ID: 22555182
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C, Manrique M, Ramos A, Garcia-Ibanez L, Cavalle L, Huarte A, Castillo C, Estrada E.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun 01; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effects of site-specific level adjustments on speech recognition with cochlear implants.
    Zhou N, Pfingst BE.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Jun 01; 35(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 24225651
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Beyond Sentence Recognition in Quiet for Older Adults: Implications for Cochlear Implant Candidacy.
    Zhang E, Coelho DH.
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Sep 01; 39(8):979-986. PubMed ID: 29912832
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M, Hanekom JJ.
    J Commun Disord; 2013 Sep 01; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 25.