These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

216 related items for PubMed ID: 28802606

  • 21. A comparison of i-gel™ and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ during general anesthesia in infants.
    Lee YC, Yoon KS, Park SY, Choi SR, Chung CJ.
    Korean J Anesthesiol; 2018 Feb; 71(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 29441173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway Supreme and laryngeal mask airway Pro-Seal for controlled ventilation during general anaesthesia in adult patients: systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Maitra S, Khanna P, Baidya DK.
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2014 May; 31(5):266-73. PubMed ID: 24145803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Observation of ventilation effects of I-gel™, Supreme™ and Ambu AuraOnce™ with respiratory dynamics monitoring in small children.
    Gu Z, Jin Q, Liu J, Chen L.
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Oct; 31(5):1035-1041. PubMed ID: 27492428
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. A prospective, randomized comparison of the LMA-protector™ and i-gel™ in paralyzed, anesthetized patients.
    Chang JE, Kim H, Lee JM, Min SW, Won D, Jun K, Hwang JY.
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Jul 04; 19(1):118. PubMed ID: 31272379
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. A prospective randomized comparison of airway seal using the novel vision-guided insertion of LMA-Supreme® and LMA-Protector®.
    van Zundert AAJ, Wyssusek KH, Pelecanos A, Roets M, Kumar CM.
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2020 Apr 04; 34(2):285-294. PubMed ID: 30953222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Comparing leak pressure of LMA® ProSeal™ versus i-gel® at head rotation: a randomized controlled trial.
    Chaki T, Koizumi M, Tachibana S, Matsumoto T, Kumagai T, Hashimoto Y, Yamakage M.
    Can J Anaesth; 2024 Jan 04; 71(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 38017196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Directly measured mucosal pressures produced by the i-gel™ and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ in paralysed anaesthetised patients.
    Eschertzhuber S, Brimacombe J, Kaufmann M, Keller C, Tiefenthaler W.
    Anaesthesia; 2012 Apr 04; 67(4):407-10. PubMed ID: 22324968
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. A randomised trial to compare i-gel and ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway for airway management in paediatric patients.
    Nirupa R, Gombar S, Ahuja V, Sharma P.
    Indian J Anaesth; 2016 Oct 04; 60(10):726-731. PubMed ID: 27761035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Comparison of Size 2 LMA-ProSeal™ and LMA-Supreme™ in Spontaneously Breathing Children: a Randomised Clinical Trial.
    Arslan Zİ, Balcı C, Oysu DA, Yılmaz M, Gürbüz N, Ilce Z.
    Balkan Med J; 2013 Mar 04; 30(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 25207076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.