These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The reliability, accuracy and minimal detectable difference of a multi-segment kinematic model of the foot-shoe complex. Bishop C, Paul G, Thewlis D. Gait Posture; 2013 Apr; 37(4):552-7. PubMed ID: 23122595 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A method to investigate the effect of shoe-hole size on surface marker movement when describing in-shoe joint kinematics using a multi-segment foot model. Bishop C, Arnold JB, Fraysse F, Thewlis D. Gait Posture; 2015 Jan; 41(1):295-9. PubMed ID: 25304087 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Plug-in-Gait calculation of the knee adduction moment in people with knee osteoarthritis during shod walking: comparison of two different foot marker models. Paterson KL, Hinman RS, Metcalf BR, Bennell KL, Wrigley TV. J Foot Ankle Res; 2017 Jan; 10():8. PubMed ID: 28174605 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Determining the maximum diameter for holes in the shoe without compromising shoe integrity when using a multi-segment foot model. Shultz R, Jenkyn T. Med Eng Phys; 2012 Jan; 34(1):118-22. PubMed ID: 21890394 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Repeatability of the modified Oxford foot model during gait in healthy adults. Wright CJ, Arnold BL, Coffey TG, Pidcoe PE. Gait Posture; 2011 Jan; 33(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 21081275 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Repeatability of a multi-segment foot model with a 15-marker set in healthy adults. Seo SG, Lee DY, Moon HJ, Kim SJ, Kim J, Lee KM, Chung CY, Choi IH. J Foot Ankle Res; 2014 Jan; 7():24. PubMed ID: 24782914 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Repeatability in the assessment of multi-segment foot kinematics. Deschamps K, Staes F, Bruyninckx H, Busschots E, Jaspers E, Atre A, Desloovere K. Gait Posture; 2012 Feb; 35(2):255-60. PubMed ID: 22100210 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Differences in neutral foot positions when measured barefoot compared to in shoes with varying stiffnesses. Shultz R, Birmingham TB, Jenkyn TR. Med Eng Phys; 2011 Dec; 33(10):1309-13. PubMed ID: 21700484 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Repeatability of stance phase kinematics from a multi-segment foot model in people aged 50 years and older. Arnold JB, Mackintosh S, Jones S, Thewlis D. Gait Posture; 2013 Jun; 38(2):349-51. PubMed ID: 23219780 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic 3D scanning as a markerless method to calculate multi-segment foot kinematics during stance phase: methodology and first application. Van den Herrewegen I, Cuppens K, Broeckx M, Barisch-Fritz B, Vander Sloten J, Leardini A, Peeraer L. J Biomech; 2014 Aug 22; 47(11):2531-9. PubMed ID: 24998032 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. An exploration of the agreement, inter- and intra-rater reliability, and reproducibility of three common methods used to measure minimum toe clearance with optical motion capture systems under three shoe conditions. Carter S. Gait Posture; 2024 Sep 22; 113():534-542. PubMed ID: 39173444 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Repeatability of skin-markers based kinematic measures from a multi-segment foot model in walking and running. Matias AB, Caravaggi P, Leardini A, Taddei UT, Ortolani M, Sacco I. J Biomech; 2020 Sep 18; 110():109983. PubMed ID: 32827772 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A multi-segment foot model based on anatomically registered technical coordinate systems: method repeatability in pediatric feet. Saraswat P, MacWilliams BA, Davis RB. Gait Posture; 2012 Apr 18; 35(4):547-55. PubMed ID: 22192872 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]