These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

226 related items for PubMed ID: 28836339

  • 1. Visual estimation versus different quantitative coronary angiography methods to assess lesion severity in bifurcation lesions.
    Grundeken MJ, Collet C, Ishibashi Y, Généreux P, Muramatsu T, LaSalle L, Kaplan AV, Wykrzykowska JJ, Morel MA, Tijssen JG, de Winter RJ, Onuma Y, Leon MB, Serruys PW.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jun; 91(7):1263-1270. PubMed ID: 28836339
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography for the prediction of functional severity in true bifurcation lesions: Insights from the randomized DK-CRUSH II, III, and IV trials.
    Zhang YJ, Zhu H, Shi SY, Muramatsu T, Pan DR, Ye F, Zhang JJ, Tian NL, Bourantas CV, Chen SL.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Mar; 87 Suppl 1():589-98. PubMed ID: 26876688
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of quantitative and qualitative coronary angiography: computer versus the eye.
    Sen T, Kilit C, Astarcioglu MA, Asarcikli LD, Aksu T, Kafes H, Parspur A, Gozubuyuk G, Amasyali B.
    Cardiovasc J Afr; 2018 Mar; 29(5):278-282. PubMed ID: 30395141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Quantitative angiography methods for bifurcation lesions: a consensus statement update from the European Bifurcation Club.
    Collet C, Onuma Y, Cavalcante R, Grundeken M, Généreux P, Popma J, Costa R, Stankovic G, Tu S, Reiber JHC, Aben JP, Lassen JF, Louvard Y, Lansky A, Serruys PW.
    EuroIntervention; 2017 May 15; 13(1):115-123. PubMed ID: 28067200
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The impact of acquisition angle differences on three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography.
    Tu S, Holm NR, Koning G, Maeng M, Reiber JH.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Aug 01; 78(2):214-22. PubMed ID: 21766427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Validity and variability in visual assessment of stenosis severity in phantom bifurcation lesions: a survey in experts during the fifth meeting of the European Bifurcation Club.
    Girasis C, Onuma Y, Schuurbiers JC, Morel MA, van Es GA, van Geuns RJ, Wentzel JJ, Serruys PW, 5th meeting of the European Bifurcation Club.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Feb 15; 79(3):361-8. PubMed ID: 22072537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Bifurcation lesions: Functional assessment by fractional flow reserve vs. anatomical assessment using conventional and dedicated bifurcation quantitative coronary angiogram.
    Sarno G, Garg S, Onuma Y, Girasis C, Tonino P, Morel MA, van Es GA, Pijls N, Serruys PW.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Nov 15; 76(6):817-23. PubMed ID: 20578164
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. In vitro validation and comparison of different software packages or algorithms for coronary bifurcation analysis using calibrated phantoms: implications for clinical practice and research of bifurcation stenting.
    Ishibashi Y, Grundeken MJ, Nakatani S, Iqbal J, Morel MA, Généreux P, Girasis C, Wentzel JJ, Garcia-Garcia HM, Onuma Y, Serruys PW.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Mar 15; 85(4):554-63. PubMed ID: 25059819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Segmental comparison between a dedicated bifurcation stent and balloon angioplasty using intravascular ultrasound and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography: A subgroup analysis of the Tryton IDE randomized trial.
    Grundeken MJ, Garcia-Garcia HM, Kumsars I, Lesiak M, Kayaert P, Dens J, Stella PR, de Winter RJ, Laak LL, Généreux P, Kaplan AV, Leon MB, Wykrzykowska JJ, Onuma Y, Serruys PW.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Feb 01; 89(2):E53-E63. PubMed ID: 27083384
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Usefulness of the Finet law to guide stent size selection in ostial left main stenting: Comparison with standard angiographic estimation.
    Rigatelli G, Zuin M, Ronco F, Caprioglio F, Cavazzini D, Giatti S, Braggion G, Perilli S, Nguyen VT.
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Oct 01; 19(7 Pt A):751-754. PubMed ID: 29706477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Bifurcation lesion assessment with advanced quantitative coronary angiography: A method still wanting.
    Kern MJ, Seto AH.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jun 01; 91(7):1271-1272. PubMed ID: 29894591
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Anatomical and functional assessment of Tryton bifurcation stent before and after final kissing balloon dilatation: Evaluations by three-dimensional coronary angiography, optical coherence tomography imaging and fractional flow reserve.
    Pyxaras SA, Toth GG, Di Gioia G, Ughi GJ, Tu S, Rusinaru D, Adriaenssens T, Reiber JHC, Leon MB, Bax JJ, Wijns W.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jul 01; 90(1):E1-E10. PubMed ID: 27567002
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Discrepancy in the assessment of jailed side branch lesions by visual estimation and quantitative coronary angiographic analysis: comparison with fractional flow reserve.
    Shin DH, Koo BK, Waseda K, Park KW, Kim HS, Corral M, Lansky A, Honda Y, Fearon WF, Fitzgerald PJ.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Nov 01; 78(5):720-6. PubMed ID: 22025472
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Outcomes of a dedicated stent in coronary bifurcations with large side branches: A subanalysis of the randomized TRYTON bifurcation study.
    Généreux P, Kini A, Lesiak M, Kumsars I, Fontos G, Slagboom T, Ungi I, Metzger DC, Wykrzykowska JJ, Stella PR, Bartorelli AL, Fearon WF, Lefèvre T, Feldman RL, Tarantini G, Bettinger N, Minalu Ayele G, LaSalle L, Francese DP, Onuma Y, Grundeken MJ, Garcia-Garcia HM, Laak LL, Cutlip DE, Kaplan AV, Serruys PW, Leon MB.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun 01; 87(7):1231-41. PubMed ID: 26397982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Automated quantification of stenosis severity on 64-slice CT: a comparison with quantitative coronary angiography.
    Boogers MJ, Schuijf JD, Kitslaar PH, van Werkhoven JM, de Graaf FR, Boersma E, van Velzen JE, Dijkstra J, Adame IM, Kroft LJ, de Roos A, Schreur JH, Heijenbrok MW, Jukema JW, Reiber JH, Bax JJ.
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jul 01; 3(7):699-709. PubMed ID: 20633847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Novel bifurcation phantoms for validation of quantitative coronary angiography algorithms.
    Girasis C, Schuurbiers JC, Onuma Y, Serruys PW, Wentzel JJ.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 May 01; 77(6):790-7. PubMed ID: 20602479
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.