These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Risk of Revision Was Not Reduced by a Double-bundle ACL Reconstruction Technique: Results From the Scandinavian Registers. Aga C, Kartus JT, Lind M, Lygre SHL, Granan LP, Engebretsen L. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Oct; 475(10):2503-2512. PubMed ID: 28631112 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of revision and rerupture rates of ACL reconstruction between autografts and allografts in the skeletally immature. Nelson IR, Chen J, Love R, Davis BR, Maletis GB, Funahashi TT. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Mar; 24(3):773-9. PubMed ID: 26860097 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Increased Risk of Revision After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Soft Tissue Allografts Compared With Autografts: Graft Processing and Time Make a Difference. Maletis GB, Chen J, Inacio MCS, Love RM, Funahashi TT. Am J Sports Med; 2017 Jul; 45(8):1837-1844. PubMed ID: 28301224 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of Graft Choice on Revision and Contralateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Results From the New Zealand ACL Registry. Rahardja R, Zhu M, Love H, Clatworthy MG, Monk AP, Young SW. Am J Sports Med; 2020 Jan; 48(1):63-69. PubMed ID: 31730379 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Revision rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft or autograft in a population 25 years old and younger. Barber FA, Cowden CH, Sanders EJ. Arthroscopy; 2014 Apr; 30(4):483-91. PubMed ID: 24680308 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]