These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Radiographic Evaluation of the Reliability of Neck Anatomic Structures as Anterior Cervical Surgical Landmarks. Liu JM, Du LX, Xiong X, Chen XY, Zhou Y, Long XH, Huang SH, Liu ZL. World Neurosurg; 2017 Jul; 103():133-137. PubMed ID: 28385657 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability and Accuracy of Palpable Anterior Neck Landmarks for the Identification of Cervical Spinal Levels. Siribumrungwong K, Sinchai C, Tangtrakulwanich B, Chaiyamongkol W. Asian Spine J; 2018 Feb; 12(1):80-84. PubMed ID: 29503686 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Submandibular approach to the C2-3 disc level: microsurgical anatomy with clinical application. Russo A, Albanese E, Quiroga M, Ulm AJ. J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Apr; 10(4):380-9. PubMed ID: 19441998 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Thoracic segmental flexion during cervical forward bending. Fiebert IM, Spyropoulos T, Peterman D, Dotson L. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 1993 Jan 01; 3(4):80-5. PubMed ID: 24573143 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The efficacy of carotid tubercle as an anatomical landmark for identification of cervical spinal level in the anterior cervical surgery: comparison with preoperative C-arm fluoroscopy. Lee JH, Lee JH, Lee HS, Lee DY, Lee DO. Clin Orthop Surg; 2013 Jun 01; 5(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 23730477 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The quantitative measurements of the intervertebral angulation and translation during cervical flexion and extension. Wu SK, Kuo LC, Lan HC, Tsai SW, Chen CL, Su FC. Eur Spine J; 2007 Sep 01; 16(9):1435-44. PubMed ID: 17464516 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics. Cunningham BW, Hu N, Zorn CM, McAfee PC. Spine J; 2010 Apr 01; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic foraminal dimensions during neck extension and rotation in fusion and artificial disc replacement: an observational study. Yeni YN, Baumer T, Oravec D, Basheer A, McDonald CP, Bey MJ, Bartol SW, Chang V. Spine J; 2018 Apr 01; 18(4):575-583. PubMed ID: 28882520 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on maintaining sagittal alignment of the functional spinal unit and overall sagittal balance of the cervical spine. Kim SW, Shin JH, Arbatin JJ, Park MS, Chung YK, McAfee PC. Eur Spine J; 2008 Jan 01; 17(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 17721713 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Threshold cervical range-of-motion necessary to detect abnormal intervertebral motion in cervical spine radiographs. Hwang H, Hipp JA, Ben-Galim P, Reitman CA. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Apr 15; 33(8):E261-7. PubMed ID: 18404096 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Adjacent-level arthroplasty following cervical fusion. Rajakumar DV, Hari A, Krishna M, Konar S, Sharma A. Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Feb 15; 42(2):E5. PubMed ID: 28142281 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Kinematic analysis of cervical spine canal diameter and its association with grade of degeneration. Jiang X, Chen D, Lou Y, Li Z. Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul 15; 25(7):2166-72. PubMed ID: 27236657 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. In vivo 3D kinematic changes in the cervical spine after laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Nagamoto Y, Iwasaki M, Sugiura T, Fujimori T, Matsuo Y, Kashii M, Sakaura H, Ishii T, Murase T, Yoshikawa H, Sugamoto K. J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep 15; 21(3):417-24. PubMed ID: 24926932 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical segmental motion at levels adjacent to disc herniation as determined with kinetic magnetic resonance imaging. Daffner SD, Xin J, Taghavi CE, Hymanson HJ, Mudiyam C, Hongyu W, Wang JC. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct 15; 34(22):2389-94. PubMed ID: 19829252 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]