These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

176 related items for PubMed ID: 28865846

  • 1. Application of a newly designed mandibular distraction device for navigation surgery in goats.
    Cai M, Chen Y, Lu X, Xu L, Wang X, Shen G.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Oct; 45(10):1704-1709. PubMed ID: 28865846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Navigation-assisted mandibular body distraction osteogenesis: a preliminary study in goats.
    Cai M, Shen G, Cheng AH, Lin Y, Yu D, Ye M.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 72(1):168.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24331570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Simulation-guided navigation for vector control in pediatric mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
    Badiali G, Cutolo F, Roncari A, Marchetti C, Bianchi A.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 45(6):969-980. PubMed ID: 28347627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Intraoral distraction osteogenesis in the baboon mandible using a tooth and bone-anchored appliance.
    Douglas LR, Douglass JB, Nakeeb S, Smith PJ, Al Rubaiya A.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Jan; 58(1):49-54; discussion 55. PubMed ID: 10632165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis with newly designed electromechanical distractor.
    Aykan A, Ugurlutan R, Zor F, Ozturk S.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 25(4):1519-23. PubMed ID: 24914755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Surgical guide assistant mandibular distraction osteogenesis and sagittal split osteotomy in the treatment of hemifacial microsomia.
    Shi L, Liu W, Yin L, Feng S, Xu S, Zhang ZY.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 26(2):498-500. PubMed ID: 25699536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Computer-aided design in double-step distraction osteogenesis of unilateral mandibular segmental defects reconstruction].
    Chen J, Ping FY, Fu XH, Xu X, Yan FG.
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Feb; 45(2):71-4. PubMed ID: 20367998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Precise screw positioning at the mandibular angle: computer assisted versus template coded.
    Lübbers HT, Kruse A, Messmer P, Grätz KW, Obwegeser JA, Matthews F.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):620-4. PubMed ID: 21403542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Computer-assisted surgery in therapeutic strategy distraction osteogenesis of hemifacial microsomia: Accuracy and predictability.
    Tan A, Chai Y, Mooi W, Chen X, Xu H, Zin MA, Lin L, Zhang Y, Yang X, Chai G.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Feb; 47(2):204-218. PubMed ID: 30583926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Distractor with supporting computer program for the reconstruction of arc defects in mandible by distraction osteogenesis.
    Ying B, Hu J, Zhu S, Li J.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):638-40. PubMed ID: 21403551
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effects of rapid distraction rate on new bone formation during mandibular distraction osteogenesis in goats.
    Long J, Tang W, Fan YB, Tian WD, Feng F, Liu L, Zheng XH, Jing W, Wu L.
    Injury; 2009 Aug; 40(8):831-4. PubMed ID: 19217101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Biomechanical considerations of mandibular lengthening and widening by gradual distraction using a computer model.
    Samchukov ML, Cope JB, Harper RP, Ross JD.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1998 Jan; 56(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 9437982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Reconstruction of curved mandibular angle defects using a new internal transport distraction device: an experiment in goats.
    Zhou LB, Shang HT, Hu M, Li DC, Sigare S, Chen BL, Liu YP, Zhao JL.
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Sep; 46(6):445-8. PubMed ID: 18336969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of two computer-assisted surgery techniques to guide a mandibular distraction osteogenesis procedure. Technical note.
    d'Hauthuille C, Taha F, Devauchelle B, Testelin S.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 34(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 15695051
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Distraction osteogenesis with a fully implantable system. Experimental study].
    Ploder O, Mayr W, Schnetz G, Unger E, Plenk H, Losert U, Ewers R.
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1999 May; 3 Suppl 1():S140-3. PubMed ID: 10414101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Changes in the inferior alveolar vessels and angiogenesis following mandibular lengthening with different rates of distraction].
    Tang Z, Zou S, Hu J.
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Jun; 20(3):203-5, 224. PubMed ID: 12600067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Changes in the inferior alveolar nerve after mandibular lengthening with different rates of distraction.
    Hu J, Tang Z, Wang D, Buckley MJ.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Sep; 59(9):1041-5; discussion 1046. PubMed ID: 11526575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Modified animal model and computer-assisted approach for dentoalveolar distraction osteogenesis to reconstruct unilateral maxillectomy defect.
    Feng Z, Zhao J, Zhou L, Dong Y, Zhao Y.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2266-74. PubMed ID: 19761922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Error analysis of a CAD/CAM method for unidirectional mandibular distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of hemifacial microsomia.
    Sun H, Li B, Zhao Z, Zhang L, Shen SG, Wang X.
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 51(8):892-7. PubMed ID: 23583007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Mandibular distraction osteogenesis: an experimental study in goats].
    Zheng XH, Tian WD, Long J, Jing W, Li SW.
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2005 May; 36(3):386-9. PubMed ID: 15931876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.