These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

712 related items for PubMed ID: 28880339

  • 1. Comparison of Corneal Dynamic and Tomographic Analysis in Normal, Forme Fruste Keratoconic, and Keratoconic Eyes.
    Wang YM, Chan TCY, Yu M, Jhanji V.
    J Refract Surg; 2017 Sep 01; 33(9):632-638. PubMed ID: 28880339
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of Corneal Tomography and a New Combined Tomographic Biomechanical Index in Subclinical Keratoconus.
    Chan TCY, Wang YM, Yu M, Jhanji V.
    J Refract Surg; 2018 Sep 01; 34(9):616-621. PubMed ID: 30199566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of corneal dynamic parameters and tomographic measurements using Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconus.
    Chan TC, Wang YM, Yu M, Jhanji V.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jan 01; 102(1):42-47. PubMed ID: 28559422
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Diagnostic Ability of Corneal Shape and Biomechanical Parameters for Detecting Frank Keratoconus.
    Sedaghat MR, Momeni-Moghaddam H, Ambrósio R, Heidari HR, Maddah N, Danesh Z, Sabzi F.
    Cornea; 2018 Aug 01; 37(8):1025-1034. PubMed ID: 29847493
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Enhanced Combined Tomography and Biomechanics Data for Distinguishing Forme Fruste Keratoconus.
    Luz A, Lopes B, Hallahan KM, Valbon B, Ramos I, Faria-Correia F, Schor P, Dupps WJ, Ambrósio R.
    J Refract Surg; 2016 Jul 01; 32(7):479-94. PubMed ID: 27400080
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Combined corneal biomechanical and tomographical indices in subclinical and forme fruste keratoconus.
    Ganesh M, Arora R, Titiyal JS.
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2024 Sep 01; 72(9):1337-1345. PubMed ID: 38990626
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Integration of Scheimpflug-Based Corneal Tomography and Biomechanical Assessments for Enhancing Ectasia Detection.
    Ambrósio R, Lopes BT, Faria-Correia F, Salomão MQ, Bühren J, Roberts CJ, Elsheikh A, Vinciguerra R, Vinciguerra P.
    J Refract Surg; 2017 Jul 01; 33(7):434-443. PubMed ID: 28681902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Posterior corneal elevation and back difference corneal elevation in diagnosing forme fruste keratoconus in the fellow eyes of unilateral keratoconus patients.
    Muftuoglu O, Ayar O, Ozulken K, Ozyol E, Akıncı A.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Sep 01; 39(9):1348-57. PubMed ID: 23820305
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of Corneal Deformation Parameters in Keratoconic and Normal Eyes Using a Non-contact Tonometer With a Dynamic Ultra-High-Speed Scheimpflug Camera.
    Mercer RN, Waring GO, Roberts CJ, Jhanji V, Wang Y, Filho JS, Hemings RA, Rocha KM.
    J Refract Surg; 2017 Sep 01; 33(9):625-631. PubMed ID: 28880338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of the morphological and biomechanical characteristics of keratoconus, forme fruste keratoconus, and normal corneas.
    Guo LL, Tian L, Cao K, Li YX, Li N, Yang WQ, Jie Y.
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2021 Nov 17; 36(8):671-678. PubMed ID: 33734947
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Indices in Distinguishing Between Normal, Very Asymmetric, and Bilateral Keratoconic Eyes.
    Herber R, Hasanli A, Lenk J, Vinciguerra R, Terai N, Pillunat LE, Raiskup F.
    J Refract Surg; 2022 Jun 17; 38(6):364-372. PubMed ID: 35686712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Second-generation corneal deformation signal waveform analysis in normal, forme fruste keratoconic, and manifest keratoconic corneas after statistical correction for potentially confounding factors.
    Zhang L, Danesh J, Tannan A, Phan V, Yu F, Hamilton DR.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct 17; 41(10):2196-204. PubMed ID: 26703296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Early Diagnosis of Keratoconus in Chinese Myopic Eyes by Combining Corvis ST with Pentacam.
    Zhang M, Zhang F, Li Y, Song Y, Wang Z.
    Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb 17; 45(2):118-123. PubMed ID: 31466466
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Keratoconus Screening With Dynamic Biomechanical In Vivo Scheimpflug Analyses: A Proof-of-Concept Study.
    Steinberg J, Amirabadi NE, Frings A, Mehlan J, Katz T, Linke SJ.
    J Refract Surg; 2017 Nov 01; 33(11):773-778. PubMed ID: 29117418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Accuracy of Scheimpflug-derived corneal biomechanical and tomographic indices for detecting subclinical and mild keratectasia in a South Asian population.
    Kataria P, Padmanabhan P, Gopalakrishnan A, Padmanaban V, Mahadik S, Ambrósio R.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Mar 01; 45(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 30527442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparative evaluation of Scheimpflug tomography parameters between thin non-keratoconic, subclinical keratoconic, and mild keratoconic corneas.
    Huseynli S, Salgado-Borges J, Alio JL.
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep 01; 28(5):521-534. PubMed ID: 29566542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Assessment of ocular biomechanics using dynamic ultra high-speed Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconic and normal eyes.
    Tian L, Ko MW, Wang LK, Zhang JY, Li TJ, Huang YF, Zheng YP.
    J Refract Surg; 2014 Nov 01; 30(11):785-91. PubMed ID: 25291757
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 36.