These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Biomechanical effects on the intermediate segment of noncontiguous hybrid surgery with cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element analysis. Wu TK, Meng Y, Liu H, Wang BY, Hong Y, Rong X, Ding C, Chen H. Spine J; 2019 Jul; 19(7):1254-1263. PubMed ID: 30742975 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. In Vivo Evidence of Early Instability and Late Stabilization in Motion Segments Immediately Superior to Anterior Cervical Arthrodesis. Chen SR, LeVasseur CM, Pitcairn S, Munsch MA, Couch BK, Kanter AS, Okonkwo DO, Shaw JD, Donaldson WF, Lee JY, Anderst WJ. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 Sep 01; 47(17):1234-1240. PubMed ID: 35794796 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical fusion for symptomatic adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical fusion surgery: Review of treatment in 41 patients. Lee SB, Cho KS. Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2017 Nov 01; 162():59-66. PubMed ID: 28938108 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Zero-profile hybrid fusion construct versus 2-level plate fixation to treat adjacent-level disease in the cervical spine. Healy AT, Sundar SJ, Cardenas RJ, Mageswaran P, Benzel EC, Mroz TE, Francis TB. J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Nov 01; 21(5):753-60. PubMed ID: 25170655 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Artificial Disk Replacement Combined With Fusion Versus 2-Level Fusion in Cervical 2-Level Disk Disease With a 5-Year Follow-up. Ji GY, Oh CH, Shin DA, Ha Y, Yi S, Kim KN, Shin HC, Yoon DH. Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Jun 01; 30(5):E620-E627. PubMed ID: 28525488 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of hybrid constructs with 2-level artificial disc replacement and 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for surgical reconstruction of the cervical spine: a kinematic study in whole cadavers. Liu B, Zeng Z, Hoof TV, Kalala JP, Liu Z, Wu B. Med Sci Monit; 2015 Apr 08; 21():1031-7. PubMed ID: 25853772 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. In vitro investigation of a new dynamic cervical implant: comparison to spinal fusion and total disc replacement. Welke B, Schwarze M, Hurschler C, Book T, Magdu S, Daentzer D. Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul 08; 25(7):2247-54. PubMed ID: 26684468 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Long-term Outcomes of the US FDA IDE Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing PCM Cervical Disc Arthroplasty With Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Phillips FM, Geisler FH, Gilder KM, Reah C, Howell KM, McAfee PC. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 May 15; 40(10):674-83. PubMed ID: 25955086 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparable long-term outcomes in patients undergoing total disc replacement or anterior cervical discectomy and noninstrumented fusion. Hirvonen T, Hämäläinen M, Konsti J, Antinheimo J, Numminen J, Siironen J, Koski-Palkén A, Niemelä M. Spine J; 2023 Dec 15; 23(12):1817-1829. PubMed ID: 37660896 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. ProDisc-C and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as surgical treatment for single-level cervical symptomatic degenerative disc disease: five-year results of a Food and Drug Administration study. Zigler JE, Delamarter R, Murrey D, Spivak J, Janssen M. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Feb 01; 38(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 23080427 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]