These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
284 related items for PubMed ID: 28893571
1. Most systematic reviews of high methodological quality on psoriasis interventions are classified as high risk of bias using ROBIS tool. Gómez-García F, Ruano J, Gay-Mimbrera J, Aguilar-Luque M, Sanz-Cabanillas JL, Alcalde-Mellado P, Maestre-López B, Carmona-Fernández PJ, González-Padilla M, García-Nieto AV, Isla-Tejera B. J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 92():79-88. PubMed ID: 28893571 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Methodological quality and risk of bias in orthodontic systematic reviews using AMSTAR and ROBIS. Hooper EJ, Pandis N, Cobourne MT, Seehra J. Eur J Orthod; 2021 Oct 04; 43(5):544-550. PubMed ID: 33723612 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Minor differences were found between AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS in the assessment of systematic reviews including both randomized and nonrandomized studies. Pieper D, Puljak L, González-Lorenzo M, Minozzi S. J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Apr 04; 108():26-33. PubMed ID: 30543911 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Benefits and Safety of Chinese Herbal Medicine in Treating Psoriasis: An Overview of Systematic Reviews. Zhang J, Yu Q, Peng L, Qin Y, Jing M, Huang D, Guo J, Xiao M, Chen M. Front Pharmacol; 2021 Apr 04; 12():680172. PubMed ID: 34276371 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality and risk of bias appraisals of systematic reviews are inconsistent across reviewers and centers. Gates M, Gates A, Duarte G, Cary M, Becker M, Prediger B, Vandermeer B, Fernandes RM, Pieper D, Hartling L. J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Sep 04; 125():9-15. PubMed ID: 32416337 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Author-paper affiliation network architecture influences the methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of psoriasis. Sanz-Cabanillas JL, Ruano J, Gomez-Garcia F, Alcalde-Mellado P, Gay-Mimbrera J, Aguilar-Luque M, Maestre-Lopez B, Gonzalez-Padilla M, Carmona-Fernandez PJ, Velez Garcia-Nieto A, Isla-Tejera B. PLoS One; 2017 Sep 04; 12(4):e0175419. PubMed ID: 28403245 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Tai Chi for improving balance and reducing falls: An overview of 14 systematic reviews. Zhong D, Xiao Q, Xiao X, Li Y, Ye J, Xia L, Zhang C, Li J, Zheng H, Jin R. Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2020 Nov 04; 63(6):505-517. PubMed ID: 31981834 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality Assessment and Risk of Bias of Systematic Reviews of Prophylactic Mesh for Parastomal Hernia Prevention Using AMSTAR and ROBIS Tools. García-Alamino JM, López-Cano M, Kroese L, Helgstrand F, Muysoms F. World J Surg; 2019 Dec 04; 43(12):3003-3012. PubMed ID: 31440779 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A psychometric study found AMSTAR 2 to be a valid and moderately reliable appraisal tool. Lorenz RC, Matthias K, Pieper D, Wegewitz U, Morche J, Nocon M, Rissling O, Schirm J, Jacobs A. J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Oct 04; 114():133-140. PubMed ID: 31152864 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictors of Higher Quality of Systematic Reviews Addressing Nutrition and Cancer Prevention. Storman D, Koperny M, Zając J, Polak M, Weglarz P, Bochenek-Cibor J, Swierz MJ, Staskiewicz W, Gorecka M, Skuza A, Wach AA, Kaluzinska K, Bała MM. Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan 03; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 35010766 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR. Dosenovic S, Jelicic Kadic A, Vucic K, Markovina N, Pieper D, Puljak L. BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May 08; 18(1):37. PubMed ID: 29739339 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]