These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

282 related items for PubMed ID: 28919727

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Stand-alone interspinous spacer versus decompressive laminectomy for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Lauryssen C, Jackson RJ, Baron JM, Tallarico RA, Lavelle WF, Deutsch H, Block JE, Geisler FH.
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2015; 12(6):763-9. PubMed ID: 26487285
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. MILD® Is an Effective Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication: MiDAS ENCORE Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Benyamin RM, Staats PS, MiDAS Encore I.
    Pain Physician; 2016 May; 19(4):229-42. PubMed ID: 27228511
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Is the interspinous process device safe and effective in elderly patients with lumbar degeneration? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Han B, Chen Y, Liang W, Yang Y, Ding Z, Yin P, Hai Y.
    Eur Spine J; 2024 Mar; 33(3):881-891. PubMed ID: 38342843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. IPD without bony decompression versus conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: 2-year results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
    Moojen WA, Arts MP, Jacobs WC, van Zwet EW, van den Akker-van Marle ME, Koes BW, Vleggeert-Lankamp CL, Peul WC, Leiden The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study Group (SIPS).
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Oct; 24(10):2295-305. PubMed ID: 25586759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Procedure for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Neurogenic Claudication: 2-Year Results of MiDAS ENCORE.
    Staats PS, Chafin TB, Golovac S, Kim CK, Li S, Richardson WB, Vallejo R, Wahezi SE, Washabaugh EP, Benyamin RM, MiDAS ENCORE Investigators.
    Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2018 Oct; 43(7):789-794. PubMed ID: 30199512
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Decompression of lumbar canal stenosis with a bilateral interlaminar versus classic laminectomy technique: a prospective randomized study.
    Soliman MAR, Ali A.
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May 01; 46(5):E3. PubMed ID: 31042649
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 1. Two-year outcomes and clinical efficacy: clinical article.
    Adogwa O, Carr RK, Kudyba K, Karikari I, Bagley CA, Gokaslan ZL, Theodore N, Cheng JS.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb 01; 18(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 23231354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.