These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

411 related items for PubMed ID: 28929865

  • 1. False-positive screens and lung cancer risk in the National Lung Screening Trial: Implications for shared decision-making.
    Pinsky PF, Bellinger CR, Miller DP.
    J Med Screen; 2018 Jun; 25(2):110-112. PubMed ID: 28929865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Cumulative incidence of false-positive test results in lung cancer screening: a randomized trial.
    Croswell JM, Baker SG, Marcus PM, Clapp JD, Kramer BS.
    Ann Intern Med; 2010 Apr 20; 152(8):505-12, W176-80. PubMed ID: 20404381
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Incidental renal tumours on low-dose CT lung cancer screening exams.
    Pinsky PF, Dunn B, Gierada D, Nath PH, Munden R, Berland L, Kramer BS.
    J Med Screen; 2017 Jun 20; 24(2):104-109. PubMed ID: 28482765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Factors Associated with a Positive Baseline Screening Exam Result in the National Lung Screening Trial.
    Balekian AA, Tanner NT, Fisher JM, Silvestri GA, Gould MK.
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2016 Sep 20; 13(9):1568-74. PubMed ID: 27387658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Performance of Lung-RADS in the National Lung Screening Trial: a retrospective assessment.
    Pinsky PF, Gierada DS, Black W, Munden R, Nath H, Aberle D, Kazerooni E.
    Ann Intern Med; 2015 Apr 07; 162(7):485-91. PubMed ID: 25664444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effective use of low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening.
    Jeffers CD, Pandey T, Jambhekar K, Meek M.
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2013 Apr 07; 42(5):220-30. PubMed ID: 24070715
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Development and Validation of a Multivariable Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Model That Includes Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening Results: A Secondary Analysis of Data From the National Lung Screening Trial.
    Tammemägi MC, Ten Haaf K, Toumazis I, Kong CY, Han SS, Jeon J, Commins J, Riley T, Meza R.
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Mar 01; 2(3):e190204. PubMed ID: 30821827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Lung cancer screening: Current status and perspective.
    Chassagnon G, Revel MP.
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2016 Oct 01; 97(10):949-953. PubMed ID: 27527243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effectiveness of Lung-RADS in Reducing False-Positive Results in a Diverse, Underserved, Urban Lung Cancer Screening Cohort.
    Kaminetzky M, Milch HS, Shmukler A, Kessler A, Peng R, Mardakhaev E, Bellin EY, Levsky JM, Haramati LB.
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Apr 01; 16(4 Pt A):419-426. PubMed ID: 30146484
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The importance of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography for Medicare beneficiaries.
    Wood DE.
    JAMA Intern Med; 2014 Dec 01; 174(12):2016-8. PubMed ID: 25317992
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Application of Lung-Screening Reporting and Data System Versus Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer Nodule Risk Calculation in the Alberta Lung Cancer Screening Study.
    Tremblay A, Taghizadeh N, MacGregor JH, Armstrong G, Bristow MS, Guo LLQ, Lydell C, Pereira R, Lee A, Elliot T, MacEachern P, Graham A, Dickinson JA, Koetzler R, Lam SC, Yang H, Bédard EL, Tammemagi M, Burrowes P.
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Oct 01; 16(10):1425-1432. PubMed ID: 31103442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The effect of different radiological models on diagnostic accuracy and lung cancer screening performance.
    Marshall HM, Zhao H, Bowman RV, Passmore LH, McCaul EM, Yang IA, Fong KM.
    Thorax; 2017 Dec 01; 72(12):1147-1150. PubMed ID: 28331076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A National Survey of Pulmonologists' Views on Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer.
    Iaccarino JM, Clark J, Bolton R, Kinsinger L, Kelley M, Slatore CG, Au DH, Wiener RS.
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2015 Nov 01; 12(11):1667-75. PubMed ID: 26368003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.