These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

242 related items for PubMed ID: 2893647

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Rogers v Commissioner: denouement of an important right-to-refuse-treatment case.
    Gutheil TG.
    Am J Psychiatry; 1985 Feb; 142(2):213-6. PubMed ID: 2857530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Involuntary patients' right to refuse medication: impact of the Riese decision on a California inpatient unit.
    Binder RL, McNiel DE.
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991 Feb; 19(4):351-7. PubMed ID: 1686192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Forcible administration of antipsychotic medication. State laws.
    Arkin HR.
    JAMA; 1984 Nov 09; 252(18):2620-1. PubMed ID: 6149323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Aftermath of the Rogers decision: assessing the costs.
    Schouten R, Gutheil TG.
    Am J Psychiatry; 1990 Oct 09; 147(10):1348-52. PubMed ID: 2119147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Legal conceptualizations, legal fictions, and the manipulation of reality: conflict between models of decision making in psychiatry and law.
    Gutheil TG, Mills MJ.
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1982 Oct 09; 10(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 6128038
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Massachusetts district court affirms the right to refuse psychotropic drugs, seclusion.
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1980 Mar 09; 31(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 7353854
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Decade of litigation has led to redefinition of patients' rights.
    Weiner BA.
    Hospitals; 1981 May 01; 55(9):67-70. PubMed ID: 7216209
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment.
    Roth LH.
    Psychiatr Ann; 1977 May 01; 7(5):50-51+. PubMed ID: 11664817
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Involuntary administration of medication in the community: the judicial opportunity.
    Schmidt MJ, Geller JL.
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989 May 01; 17(3):283-92. PubMed ID: 2571371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The right to refuse treatment: recent Canadian developments.
    Gratzer TG, Matas M.
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994 May 01; 22(2):249-56. PubMed ID: 7949413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Continuing case law development in the right to refuse treatment.
    Mills MJ, Yesavage JA, Gutheil TG.
    Am J Psychiatry; 1983 Jun 01; 140(6):715-9. PubMed ID: 6846630
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Constitutional law--an involuntarily committed mental patient has a qualified right to make treatment decisions absent a formal adjudication of incompetence--Rogers v. Commissioner of the Department of Mental Health.
    White AB.
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1984 Jun 01; 18(3):503-11. PubMed ID: 11658616
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The right to refuse treatment with antipsychotic medications: retrospect and prospect.
    Appelbaum PS.
    Am J Psychiatry; 1988 Apr 01; 145(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 3279829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.