These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
601 related items for PubMed ID: 28937936
1. Is high T-1 slope a significant risk factor for developing interlaminar bony fusion after cervical laminoplasty? A retrospective cohort study. Oichi T, Oshima Y, Oka H, Taniguchi Y, Chikuda H, Matsubayashi Y, Takeshita K, Tanaka S. J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Dec; 27(6):627-632. PubMed ID: 28937936 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of dynamic factors on surgical outcomes after double-door laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine. Maruo K, Moriyama T, Tachibana T, Inoue S, Arizumi F, Daimon T, Yoshiya S. J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):938-43. PubMed ID: 25279653 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation between cervical spine sagittal alignment and clinical outcome after cervical laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Lee CK, Shin DA, Yi S, Kim KN, Shin HC, Yoon DH, Ha Y. J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):100-7. PubMed ID: 26431070 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Is there a difference in range of motion, neck pain, and outcomes in patients with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament versus those with cervical spondylosis, treated with plated laminoplasty? Fujimori T, Le H, Ziewacz JE, Chou D, Mummaneni PV. Neurosurg Focus; 2013 Jul; 35(1):E9. PubMed ID: 23815254 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion versus posterior laminoplasty for the treatment of oppressive myelopathy owing to cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: a meta-analysis. Qin R, Chen X, Zhou P, Li M, Hao J, Zhang F. Eur Spine J; 2018 Jun; 27(6):1375-1387. PubMed ID: 29335903 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Can C3 Laminectomy Reduce Interlaminar Bony Fusion and Preserve the Range of Motion After Cervical Laminoplasty? Lee DH, Cho JH, Hwang CJ, Lee CS, Cho SK, Ha JK. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Dec 15; 41(24):1884-1890. PubMed ID: 27517513 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes in cervical laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Ha Y, Shin JJ. Neurosurg Rev; 2020 Oct 15; 43(5):1409-1421. PubMed ID: 31512014 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Interlaminar bony fusion after cervical laminoplasty: its characteristics and relationship with clinical results. Iizuka H, Iizuka Y, Nakagawa Y, Nakajima T, Toda N, Shimegi A, Tsutsumi S, Takagishi K. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Mar 15; 31(6):644-7. PubMed ID: 16540867 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictive factors affecting outcome after cervical laminoplasty. Yoon ST, Raich A, Hashimoto RE, Riew KD, Shaffrey CI, Rhee JM, Tetreault LA, Skelly AC, Fehlings MG. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct 15; 38(22 Suppl 1):S232-52. PubMed ID: 23962999 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Laminoplasty versus laminectomy with posterior spinal fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: influence of cervical alignment on outcomes. Lau D, Winkler EA, Than KD, Chou D, Mummaneni PV. J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Nov 15; 27(5):508-517. PubMed ID: 28862572 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Modified Unilateral Open-door Laminoplasty with Posterior Muscle-Ligament Complex Preservation for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. Chen C, Yang C, Yang S, Gao Y, Zhang Y, Wu X, Hua W, Shao Z. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Dec 15; 44(24):1697-1704. PubMed ID: 31794507 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]