These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

519 related items for PubMed ID: 28951262

  • 1. Prolapse recurrence following sacrocolpopexy vs uterosacral ligament suspension: a comparison stratified by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage.
    Lavelle ES, Giugale LE, Winger DG, Wang L, Carter-Brooks CM, Shepherd JP.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 218(1):116.e1-116.e5. PubMed ID: 28951262
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Estimated levator ani subtended volume: a novel assay for predicting surgical failure after uterosacral ligament suspension.
    Wyman AM, Rodrigues AA, Hahn L, Greene KA, Bassaly R, Hart S, Miladinovic B, Hoyte L.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 May; 214(5):611.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26596232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
    Haj-Yahya R, Chill HH, Levin G, Reuveni-Salzman A, Shveiky D.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. RCT of vaginal extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension (VEULS) with anterior mesh versus sacrocolpopexy: 4-year outcome.
    Ow LL, Lim YN, Lee J, Murray C, Thomas E, Leitch A, Rosamilia A, Dwyer PL.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1607-1614. PubMed ID: 29961110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension: An alternative to McCall culdoplasty in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Novara L, Sgro LG, Pecchio S, Ottino L, Tomatis V, Biglia N.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Sep; 240():278-281. PubMed ID: 31351324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Apical pelvic organ prolapse repair via vaginal-assisted natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: Initial experience from a tertiary care hospital.
    Alay I, Kaya C, Cengiz H, Yildiz S, Aslan O, Yasar L, Ekin M.
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2021 Jul; 14(3):346-352. PubMed ID: 32967055
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Characteristics associated with composite surgical failure over 5 years of women in a randomized trial of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
    Richter HE, Sridhar A, Nager CW, Komesu YM, Harvie HS, Zyczynski HM, Rardin C, Visco A, Mazloomdoost D, Thomas S, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Pelvic Floor Disorders Network.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jan; 228(1):63.e1-63.e16. PubMed ID: 35931131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [A five-year analysis of effect on transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension with or without native-tissue repair for middle compartment defect].
    Zhang YH, Lu YX, Liu X, Liu JX, Shen WJ, Zhao Y, Niu K, Wang WY.
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jul 25; 54(7):445-451. PubMed ID: 31365956
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension: A Retrospective Cohort of Absorbable and Permanent Suture Groups.
    Bradley MS, Bickhaus JA, Amundsen CL, Newcomb LK, Truong T, Weidner AC, Siddiqui NY.
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018 Jul 25; 24(3):207-212. PubMed ID: 28657988
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Effectiveness of vaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension for treatment of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse].
    Shen WJ, Lu YX, Liu X, Liu JX, Duan L, Zhang YH, Niu K, Wang WY, Qin L, Zhang XL.
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Apr 25; 54(4):232-238. PubMed ID: 31006188
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Open sacrocolpopexy and vaginal apical repair: retrospective comparison of success and serious complications.
    Rogers RG, Nolen TL, Weidner AC, Richter HE, Jelovsek JE, Shepherd JP, Harvie HS, Brubaker L, Menefee SA, Myers D, Hsu Y, Schaffer JI, Wallace D, Meikle SF, NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Aug 25; 29(8):1101-1110. PubMed ID: 29802413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Long-term effectiveness of transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension].
    Duan L, Lu YX, Shen WJ, Liu X, Liu JX, Zhang YH, Ge J, Zhao Y, Niu K, Wang WY.
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun 25; 52(6):363-368. PubMed ID: 28647957
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Long-term outcomes and predictors of failure after surgery for stage IV apical pelvic organ prolapse.
    Linder BJ, El-Nashar SA, Mukwege AA, Weaver AL, McGree ME, Rhodes DJ, Gebhart JB, Klingele CJ, Occhino JA, Trabuco EC.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jun 25; 29(6):803-810. PubMed ID: 28921036
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function.
    De La Cruz JF, Myers EM, Geller EJ.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014 Jun 25; 21(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 24780383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of two natural tissue repair-based surgical techniques; sacrospinous fixation and uterosacral ligament suspension for pelvic organ prolapse treatment.
    Topdagi Yilmaz EP, Yapca OE, Topdagi YE, Atakan Al R, Kumtepe Y.
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Apr 25; 50(4):101905. PubMed ID: 32916370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Recurrence of vaginal prolapse after total vaginal hysterectomy with concurrent vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: comparison between normal-weight and overweight women.
    Rappa C, Saccone G.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov 25; 215(5):601.e1-601.e4. PubMed ID: 27342042
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.