These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

223 related items for PubMed ID: 28957975

  • 1. Comparison of the Spectral-Temporally Modulated Ripple Test With the Arizona Biomedical Institute Sentence Test in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Lawler M, Yu J, Aronoff JM.
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):760-766. PubMed ID: 28957975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Examining the Relationship Between Speech Recognition and a Spectral-Temporal Test With a Mixed Group of Hearing Aid and Cochlear Implant Users.
    Aronoff JM, Duitsman L, Matusik DK, Hussain S, Lippmann E.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Mar 17; 64(3):1073-1080. PubMed ID: 33719538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T, Fastl H, Baumann U.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Mar 17; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Fundamental frequency information for speech recognition via bimodal stimulation: cochlear implant in one ear and hearing aid in the other.
    Shpak T, Most T, Luntz M.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Mar 17; 35(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 24141594
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. List equivalency of the AzBio sentence test in noise for listeners with normal-hearing sensitivity or cochlear implants.
    Schafer EC, Pogue J, Milrany T.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Mar 17; 23(7):501-9. PubMed ID: 22992257
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The Effect of Hearing Aid Bandwidth and Configuration of Hearing Loss on Bimodal Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Neuman AC, Zeman A, Neukam J, Wang B, Svirsky MA.
    Ear Hear; 2019 Mar 17; 40(3):621-635. PubMed ID: 30067559
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Assessing the Quality of Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing: Implications for Combined Electroacoustic Stimulation With Cochlear Implants.
    Spitzer ER, Landsberger DM, Friedmann DR.
    Ear Hear; 2021 Mar 17; 42(2):475-486. PubMed ID: 32976249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Criteria for Selecting an Optimal Device for the Contralateral Ear of Children with a Unilateral Cochlear Implant.
    Jeong SW, Kang MY, Kim LS.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2015 Mar 17; 20(5):314-21. PubMed ID: 26277845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Behavioral Measures of Temporal Processing and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Blankenship C, Zhang F, Keith R.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Oct 17; 27(9):701-713. PubMed ID: 27718347
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C, Manrique M, Ramos A, Garcia-Ibanez L, Cavalle L, Huarte A, Castillo C, Estrada E.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun 17; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Dynamic Current Focusing Compared to Monopolar Stimulation in a Take-Home Trial of Cochlear Implant Users.
    van Groesen NRA, Briaire JJ, de Jong MAM, Frijns JHM.
    Ear Hear; 2005 Jun 17; 44(2):306-317. PubMed ID: 36279119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Cochlear implant users' spectral ripple resolution.
    Jeon EK, Turner CW, Karsten SA, Henry BA, Gantz BJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Oct 17; 138(4):2350-8. PubMed ID: 26520316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Sound Localization and Speech Perception in Noise of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Bimodal Fitting Versus Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Choi JE, Moon IJ, Kim EY, Park HS, Kim BK, Chung WH, Cho YS, Brown CJ, Hong SH.
    Ear Hear; 2017 Oct 17; 38(4):426-440. PubMed ID: 28085740
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Bimodal Hearing or Bilateral Cochlear Implants? Ask the Patient.
    Gifford RH, Dorman MF.
    Ear Hear; 2019 Oct 17; 40(3):501-516. PubMed ID: 30285977
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of Two Spectro-Temporal Ripple Tests and Their Relation to the Matrix Speech-in-Noise Sentence Test in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    van Groesen NRA, Briaire JJ, Frijns JHM.
    Ear Hear; 2019 Oct 17; 44(5):1221-1228. PubMed ID: 37046376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Age-Related Performance on Vowel Identification and the Spectral-temporally Modulated Ripple Test in Children With Normal Hearing and With Cochlear Implants.
    DiNino M, Arenberg JG.
    Trends Hear; 2018 Oct 17; 22():2331216518770959. PubMed ID: 29708065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. High- and Low-Performing Adult Cochlear Implant Users on High-Variability Sentence Recognition: Differences in Auditory Spectral Resolution and Neurocognitive Functioning.
    Tamati TN, Ray C, Vasil KJ, Pisoni DB, Moberly AC.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 May 17; 31(5):324-335. PubMed ID: 31580802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Validation of a clinical assessment of spectral-ripple resolution for cochlear implant users.
    Drennan WR, Anderson ES, Won JH, Rubinstein JT.
    Ear Hear; 2014 May 17; 35(3):e92-8. PubMed ID: 24552679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Application of Noise Reduction Algorithm ClearVoice in Cochlear Implant Processing: Effects on Noise Tolerance and Speech Intelligibility in Noise in Relation to Spectral Resolution.
    Dingemanse JG, Goedegebure A.
    Ear Hear; 2015 May 17; 36(3):357-67. PubMed ID: 25479412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Spectral-Temporal Modulated Ripple Discrimination by Children With Cochlear Implants.
    Landsberger DM, Padilla M, Martinez AS, Eisenberg LS.
    Ear Hear; 2018 May 17; 39(1):60-68. PubMed ID: 28682810
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.